"EMERGING
VIRUSES by Leonard G. Horowitz
AIDS
& EBOLA: Nature, Accident or Intentional" Tetrahedron
Inc. Rockport, MA 1996.
Forword
written by
W.
John Martin, M.D., Ph.D. http://www.ccid.org/safety.htm#
All
at once it seems, new viruses and virus-related diseases have
threatened the health of humans and many animal species. How did this
situation arise? Could it be that scientific studies and the emergence
of new pathogens are not totally unrelated events? In writing this text,
Dr. Horowitz has bravely questioned the extent to which scientific
research and lax government oversight may have contributed to the
present and coming plagues.
Open
debate on this issue has been soundly discouraged. Opponents to open
dialogue on the apparent relationship between early viral research and
the latest germ discoveries argue that little good, and considerable
harm, would come from a full disclosure of the facts. Exposing the
truth, many believed, would likely: 1) tarnish the reputations of
certain scientists, 2) make it more difficult to maintain science
funding, 3) promote antigovernment sentiment, and 4) likely leave many
issues unresolved. Others argued that it was simply too late to undo
past mistakes. The fact that a better understanding of the new viruses'
origins could lead to new treatment approaches, and, more importantly,
to ways of preventing future outbreaks, was disregarded.
In
considering the recent genesis of HIV and the Ebola viruses, Dr.
Horowitz's book has explored three areas of great general and scientific
interest: 1) the history of intensive research into the viral causes of
cancer wherein readers can become familiar with the many, now
questionable, virus transmission experiments, 2) the CIA and Department
of Defense efforts to develop and defend against biological weapons of
germ warfare. Here Dr. Horowitz should be especially congratulated for
presenting well-researched little known facts that, though highly
disturbing, are an important piece of history that may also bear heavily
on the emergence of new viruses, and 3) vaccine production. Clearly, as
anyone who reads this book will conclude, there is a great need for more
open dialogue concerning the past and present risks inherent in the
production of live viral vaccines. It is this topic that I am pleased to
address here.
In
1798, Edward Jenner, an English physician advanced the use of cowpox (vaccinia) virus for immunizing humans against smallpox. He recognized
that pathogens can behave differently while infecting different species.
Indeed, he theorized that the vaccinia infection, which caused mild
problems for cows, caused more severe ailments in horses. Only after
adapting to cows, did vaccinia acquire limited infectivity for humans.
The
open sores that humans developed were far less severe than those induced
by smallpox (variola) virus and essentially remained localized to the
site of inoculation. Moreover, contact with vaccinia virus caused
individuals to become virtually immune to the widespread disease caused
by the smallpox virus. The success of vaccination is reflected in
today's total elimination of smallpox as a disease.Jenner's vaccination
approach was followed in the twentieth century by Pasteur's use of
rabies virus grown in rabbit's brain, and by Theiler's finding that he
could reduce the effect of yellow fever virus by growing it in chicken
embryos.
These
successes set the precedent for other scientists to attempt to reduce
the pathogenicity of other human and animal viruses by inoculating them
into foreign species. Although we now look back with some disdain at the
crudeness of early immunization experiments‹such as the 1938
injections of polio virus, grown in mouse brains, into humans, most
people, including scientists, are unaware that we still use primary
monkey kidney cells to produce live polio virus vaccine. Likewise, dog
and duck kidney cells were used to make licensed rubella vaccines.
Experimental vaccines, grown in animal tissues and intended for human
use, were commonly tested in African monkeys, and it is likely that many
of these monkeys were released back into the wild. This practice may
have led to the emergence of primate diseases, some of which could have
been transmitted back to humans.
Large
numbers of rural Africans were also chosen as test recipients of
experimental human vaccines. In veterinary medicine, live viral vaccines
have been widely used in domestic pets and in animals destined to become
part of the foodchain.
Undoubtedly,
many cross-species transfer of viruses have occurred in the process.
Even today, more than ten foreign species are used to produce currently
licensed vaccines for cats and dogs. The general acceptance of the
safety of cross-species produced vaccines was supported in part by the
generalization that there are inherent restrictions to the interspecies
spread of disease. Thus, like vaccinia, mostviruses are less harmful,
but others can be far more dangerous after invading a foreign host. One
dramatic example is that of the human infection caused by the
herpes-type monkey B virus. This germ remains a rather harmless invader
of monkeys, but place it in humans, and striking, severe, acute illness
results which commonly ends in death.
Likewise, a modified horse-measles-virus (morbillivirus) can be lethal to man. Other examples include the relatively mild dog distemper morbillivirus that was blamed for the death of some 3,000 lions in the Serengeti; the cat-adapted parvovirus that caused worldwide infection in dogs; and the mouse-derived lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus that caused severe hepatitis in monkeys. It is the slow onset of disease that can be particularly baffling, especially when considering potential viral diseases transmitted through vaccines. Most acute diseases are relatively easy to recognize and amenable to further prevention. The delayed onset of chronic debilitating diseases that could be associated with animal viruses finding their way into a new species, e.g., man, are much more challenging. Here, the association between the germ and the symptoms it causes is obscured. Such an association would be especially hard to establish if the clinical features presented during the illness are poorly defined and mimic those of other known ailments.
One example is the 1996 concern over the food-borne transmission of the prion disease scrapie. Initially carried by infected sheep, this protein caused bovine spongiform encepalopathy in "mad" cows. Then it was apparently passed on to humans resulting in juvenile Crutzfeldt-Jakob disease. While in some cases disease transmission has been traced to certain vaccine lots, other times, even widely distributed licensed vaccines have been found to be contaminated. Yellow fever vaccine was known to contain avian leukosis virus.*
During
World War II, batches of yellow fever vaccines were inadvertently also
contaminated with hepatitis B virus. Current measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)
vaccines contain low levels of reverse transcriptase, an enzyme
associated with retroviruses. Both Salk and Sabin polio vaccines made
from rhesus monkeys contained live monkey viruses called SV40, short for
the fortieth monkey virus discovered. As Dr. Horowitz documents, polio
vaccines may also have contained numerous other monkey viruses, some of
which may have provided some building blocks for the emergence of HIV- 1
and human AIDS .
The
finding of SV40 in rhesus monkey kidney cells, during the early 1960s,
led to a rapid switch to African green monkeys for polio vaccine
production. Kidney cells from African green monkeys, still being used to
produce live polio vaccines today, may have been infected with monkey
viruses that were not easily detectable. The monkeys used before 1980,
for example, were likely to have been infected with simian
immunodeficiency virus (SIV9a virus genetically related to HIV-1. The
origin of this virus and whether it contaminated any experimental
vaccines are issues that need addressing.
* Editor's note: This is the retrovirus that causes leukemia in chickens.What makes vaccines so troublesome is that their production and administration allows viral contamination to breach the two natural barriers that often restrict cross-species infections: First is the skin. Direct inoculation of vaccines breaches this natural barrier and has been shown to produce increased infections in animals and humans. Such was the case when SV40 was injected intramuscularly in contaminated Salk polio vaccine. Later it was learned that Sabin's orally administered polio vaccines were safer since the live simian viruses were digested in the stomach and thereby inactivated. Additionally risky, when it comes to breaking the skin barrier, is the chance of transmitting viruses from one person to another through the use of unsterilized needles.
Second
is the unique and natural viral surface characteristics that reduce the
chance that viruses might jump species. The mixing of vaccine viruses
with others found in the cells and tissues used to develop the vaccine
can potentially lead to the development of new recombinant mutants that
are more adaptive and have wider host range than either of the original
viruses. This can especially happen when a live viral vaccine produced
in cells from one species is then given to another species.
Also
of concern is the transmission of new genetic information along with the
vaccine virus. For instance, early adenoviral vaccines, produced in
rhesus monkeys' kidney cells, developed to protect people against
respiratory infections, incorporated parts of the SV40 virus that
remained as a vaccine contaminant even after production of the vaccine
virus was switched to human cells. Numerous other vaccines, especially
those that were used in early field trials in Africa, should be analyzed
for those genetic components which characterize today's monkey and human
pathogens.
Unfortunately,
this new awareness of potential problems with live viral vaccines has
had little impact on the viral vaccine approval process. Seemingly, U.S.
government agencies, principally the FDA, have been reluctant to impose
additional testing requirements on vaccines once they are approved for
use. In effect, government officials are given a single opportunity to
decide on a new vaccine's safety. Even then, government regulators
themselves may be denied certain critial information belonging to the
vaccine industry. Specifically, FDA regulations are written so as not to
compel industry to reveal testing information not directly pertaining to
the lots submitted for clinical use. The FDA is reluctant to admit its
lack of knowledge about vaccines to the medical/scientific community.
Yet, practicing physicians are expected to unquestionably endorse the
safety of vaccines under all circumstances and to all individuals.
Aside from these bureaucratic barriers to viral vaccine safety assurance, there are additional major concerns. Since vaccine development information is considered proprietary ‹protected by nondisclosure policies‹ government officials and researchers must shield potential safety issues from public scrutiny. This censorship is rationalized by the all too persuasive argument that vaccines cannot be criticized lest the public become non-compliant in taking them. Finally, this silence is buttressed by the small number of people capable of critically evaluating vaccine manufacturing and safety testing procedures. In essence, health care professionals and the general public know little about the possible dangers of live viral vaccines.
As an illustration, the issue of possible simian cytomegalovirus (SCMV) contamination of live polio virus vaccines has been suppressed since 1972. On the eve of Nixon's war on cancer, a joint Lederle Corporation/FDA Bureau of Biologics study showed that eleven test monkeys, imported for polio vaccine production, tested positively for SCMV. The reluctance of the FDA to act on this matter was revealed in a corporate memo delivered the following year. Even in 1995, following a report to FDA officials concerning a patient infected with a SCMV-derived virus, no new in-house testing of polio vaccines for SCMV has occurred. Moreover, this author's specific requests for vaccine material to undertake specific testing, were denied on the basis of protecting "proprietary" interests.
This basic flaw in the regulatory process must be addressed‹ the FDA must be responsive to the medical-scientific community's need for accurate information regarding the potential hazards of products released for use in society. In the event that public health and safety concerns arise, industry should wave its right to maintain proprietary intelligence. This would enable the FDA to disclose more information concerning the safety of FDA regulated products to the medical scientific community. Such a proposal should be included in the all pending and future FDA reforms.
It
is against this background of possible risks of past viral vaccine
studies, uncertain biological recombinants, bureaucratic censorship, a
rising tide of medical consumerism in the information age, and an urgent
need for legislative FDA reform, that Dr. Horowitz's work contributes.
At minimum, what you are about to read exposes many important facts
which, unfortunately, few people realize and all would be better off
knowing.
-W.
JOHN MARTIN, M.D. PH.D.*
http://www.ccid.org/safety.htm
A Speech Before the Citizens Against Legal Loopholes Rally,
The Capitol Mall, Washington, D.C., Labor Day Weekend, 1996
By Leonard G. Horowitz, President, Tetrahedron Incorporated, a nonprofit educational corporation, P. O. Box 402, Rockport, Massachusetts 01966
Copyright © 1996, Leonard G. Horowitz. All rights reserved.
Dear Friends and Patriots,
My name is Dr. Len Horowitz, and some time ago, probably like many of you, I considered myself a lifelong liberal democrat. Fortunately, or unfortunately, that part of me died. When I realized the forces behind so-called liberal democracy were the flip side of the same corrupt coin as the republican political establishment, that is, I opened my eyes to witness a shadow government of military-medical-industrial dictators, the naive person I was had a stroke, keeled over, and praise the lord, died. And I didn't need to call Dr. Jack Kevorkian in to let it rest in peace. What brought me to this realization and this meeting today is a unique story.
Six years ago, most of you can recall, the highly publicized case of the Florida dentist who infected his patients with AIDS--the case of, the beautiful teenager, Kimberly Bergalis, who died shortly after testifying before Congress in a wheel-chair. At the time I was serving as the chief professional advisor to the largest dental and medical catalog supply company in the world. The day the story broke I was assigned to develop patient and professional educational materials to help allay the public's growing fear of visiting dental and medical offices in the age of AIDS. You may recall how terrified most people became about a routine trip to the dentist at that time. So I began by investigating the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDCs) official investigation reports on the case. And to make a long story short, I found the reports to be scientifically bogus. I later learned that the government had covered-up key evidence in the tragedy in an effort the maintain the case an unsolvable mystery.
In essence they had committed scientific fraud and misconduct and, in the process, concealed the most incriminating evidence against the dentist--a very bright, scientifically trained, ex-military dentist, who believed he was dying of a virus that the government had created. Yes, you heard me correctly, a virus that the government had created.
Now, the problem I had was reconciling the fact that the dentist, though a psychopath, was no fool. And he held in his possession one of the most incriminating documents I had ever seen. A 1970 Department of Defense Appropriations request for $10 million for the development of immune system ravaging viruses for germ warfare. In fact, the document, which I lay before you today, reads like this:
"Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. . . A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million. . . . It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations."
In fact it was the National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council (NAS-NRC) that had informed the Defense Department that this research was possible.
Now, according to legal testimony given to government officals, this knowledge enraged the Florida dentist so much it moved him to intentionally inject his patients with HIV-tainted anesthetics. In essence, he did what all organized serial killers love to do, express a vendetta, like the mail-bomber, play games with the authorities, trap them in a catch-22, whereby they'd be damned if they told the truth, and called him a serial killer, because the whole world would want to know motive, and every reporter would ultimately find out as I did, what drove him crazy and who he really hated and ultimately attacked. And if they told a lie, or maintained the case, as they did, a mystery, it would hold America and all of health care hostage to irrational fear of routine health care in the age of AIDS.
Now all of this I documented in three published scientific reports and my last book "Deadly Innocence: The Kimberly Bergalis Case--Solving the Greatest Murder Mystery in the History of American Medicine." I present these publications and documents here for your critical examination.
So Dr. Acer created a crime, a mystery, that couldn't be solved, without implicating the government and causing a larger mystery to be investigated. That is, the origin of AIDS and Ebola--the subject of my last three years of research, and why I have come before you today. In fact, I investigated the Department of Defense's germ warfare appropriations request and learned that the option to develop synthetic biological agents--bioweapons as alternatives to nuclear weapons--came from Dr. Henry Kissinger, who was gradually placed in his position of authority as National Security Advisor under Richard Nixon, the most powerful man in government, by Nelson Rockefeller and his affiliates at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Moreover, I traced where the money went. It went, in fact, to a firm called Litton Bionetics, a subsidiary of the mega-military contractor Litton Industries, whose President, Roy Ash, was being considered as an alternate to Henry Kissinger for the National Security Advisor post. Instead, Roy Ash became Richard Nixon's chairman of the Presidents Advisory Council on Executive Organizations, and Assistant to the President of the United States. And Litton Industries was given over $5 billion in military contracts during the first term of the Nixon administration, $10 million of which went towards the development of AIDS-like viruses. A mere drop in the bucket.
But before I tell you exactly what was done with your $10 million of taxpayer money, some background on Kissinger and Rockefeller's influence is in order.
Among Henry Kissinger's most influential patrons as he worked his way up the ladder of success to become Nixon's ÒDeputy to the President for National Security, was Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, the son of Standard Oil, that is Exxon, heir John D. Rockefeller, Jr.
The Rockefeller family's involvement in the medical industrial complex, health science research, and American politics is clearly important.
Before World War II, major administration of medical research, or financing by federal agencies, had been generally opposed by America's scientific community. In fact, it was only during times of war that organizations like the NAS or the NRC received major funding. Both the NAS, established during the Civil War, and the NRC, set up during the First World War, were largely ignored in times of peace.
Between 1900 and 1940, private foundations and universities financed most medical research. According to Paul Starr, author of The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The rise of a sovereign profession and the making of a vast industry, the most richly endowed research center, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research was established in New York in 1902 and by 1928 had received from John D. Rockefeller $65 million in endowment funds. In contrast, as late as 1938, as little as $2.8 million in federal funding was budgeted for the entire U.S. Public Health Service. Therefore, it is easy to see that Rockefeller family investment in health science research predated, and far surpassed, even the federal government's.
More than the New Deal, the Second World War created the greatest boom in federal government and private industry support for medical research. Prior to the war, American science and medicine was heavily influenced by German models. This precedent was bolstered during the 1930s when the Nazis purged Jewish scientists from German universities and biological laboratories. These changes, according to Starr, significantly altered the course of American health science and medicine. Many of Germany's most brilliant Jewish researchers emigrated to the United States just as the movement burgeoned to privatize war related biological and medical research.
At this time, the Rockefeller led medical industrial complex was fully poised to influence, and take advantage of, Congress's first series of measures to promote cancer research and cancer control. In 1937, the new federal legislation authorized the establishment of the National Cancer Institute under the National Institutes of Health, and, for the first time, the Public Health Service to make grants to outside researchers. The Rockefellers exercised significant control over the outcomes of these grants and research efforts through the foundations they established.
Following the war, Henry Kissinger, who had become General Alexander Bolling's German translator and principle assistant (Bolling, of course, was the 'Godfather' to the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency that ran "Project Paperclip," the secret exfiltration of approximately 2,000 high level Nazi's, about 900 of whom were military scientists and medical researchers, including Erich Traub, Hitler's top biological weapons developer and virus expert. Bolling also served as a high ranking member of the Inter-American Defense Board, a Washington based group that delivered Walter Emil Schreiber, Hitler's chief medical scientist, the "Angel of Death" Joseph Mengele, and his assistant, "the butcher of Lyon," Klaus Barbie, among others, to safe havens in South America where they worked on CIA projects.) In fact it was Henry Kissinger's job to seek and find such Nazi's that might be of service to America, and Kissinger became the chief of Army Counter-Intelligence in this regard. He trained other agents to hunt down Nazi's at the European Command Intelligence School in Oberammergau, not to be tried for war crimes necessarily, but rather to serve U.S. military rather than Russian interests.
It was this operation that principally spirited the creation of the CIA as a cover agency for the powerful Gehlen Org, the German intelligence agency run by Reinhard Gehlen--an organization whose power superseded even the Nazi SS because of its prewar connections with German military intelligence.
After Hitler, Gehlen served Allen Welsh Dulles, whose "Operation Sunshine" brought Nazis into the U.S. spy service.
You may be interested to know who paid for the importation of Nazis into American central intelligence, the military, and industry? Three groups: The first was "The Sovereign Military Order of Malta" (SMOM), perhaps the most powerful reactionary segment of European aristocracy, that for almost a thousand years, starting with the crusades in the Twelfth Century, funded military operations against countries and ideas considered a threat to its power; Second was the Nazi war chest that was largely funneled through the Vatican and the Rockefeller owned Chase Manhattan Bank, whose Paris branch conducted business as usual throughout the Nazi occupation of France, and thirdly, some of us and our parents--American taxpayers.
Moreover, during this period, the Council on Foreign Relations, along with the CIA, grew in power under the leadership of Nelson Rockefeller, and in 1955, while serving as President Eisenhower's assistant for international affairs, Rockefeller invited Kissinger to discuss national security issues at the Quantico (Virginia) Marine Base. Following their meeting, according to Walter Isaacson's biography of Kissinger, the diplomat became Rockefeller's closest intellectual associate, and soon after, Kissinger authored several military proposals for Eisenhower to consider. Unimpressed, Eisenhower turned them down.
As a result, Rockefeller sent Eisenhower his resignation and then launched a Special Studies Project that explored the critical choices America faced militarily in the coming years. Kissinger agreed to direct this new project and published a 468-page book on his findings. The treatise proposed that tactical nuclear weapons be developed and a bomb shelter [be built] in every house in preparation for limited thermonuclear war. The willingness to engage in nuclear war when necessary is part of the price of our freedom, Kissinger argued.
So those of you my age can recall the anxiety grade school students felt while drilling for possible nuclear attacks. You can thank Kissinger and the Rockefeller-led military-industrialists for this "price for freedom."
Eisenhower, you may remember, warned America that the gravest threat to world security, democracy, and even spirituality, was the growing military industrial complex. And the Rockefellers and Kissinger played leading roles in its evil expansion. Bent on creating what President Bush openly heralded as a "New World Order," few people realize the current international alignment of economic powers is a direct result of actualizing Henry Kissinger's contemporary manifesto--a tribute to the Sovereign Military Order of Malta--entitled "The Meaning of History." In this Kissinger 1955 Harvard doctoral thesis he argues that the concept of peace on earth is naive. Peace must be secured by the creation of small wars around the planet on a continuing basis so as to maintain an international order of economic powers, and of course, keep the military industrialists happy.
In my latest book, "Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola--Nature, Accident, or Intentional?", I traced Dr. Erich Traub's movements to the U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute, where he conducted experiments on animals to determine the lethal doses of more than forty strains of highly infectious viruses. Within ten years, the Navy's Biomedical Research Laboratory, in association with the University of California, along with Litton Bionetics, became a chief supplier of viruses and cell cultures for NCI researchers throughout the world. Funding for this work was largely controlled by the NCI, Rockefeller and Sloan Foundations.
A search through Sloan Foundation's annual reports, on file in Manhattan's New York Public Library, revealed nine ghastly and incriminating reasons that, most incredibly, tied all the elements of my "Emerging Viruses" investigation together. The Sloan Foundation:
(1) supported black educational initiatives consistent with the COINTELPRO Black Nationalist Hate Group campaign (you may recall reports last year that in surveys of 1,000 Southern Christian African Americans, two-thirds reported their belief that the AIDS epidemic may be genocide, while one-third was convinced it was;
(2) the Sloan Foundation administered mass-media-public-persuasion experiments completely consistent with the CIA's Project MKULTRA efforts to develop brainwashing technologies and drugs to affect large populations;
(3) funded much of the earliest cancer research involving the genetic engineering of mutant viruses;
(4) began major funding of the National Academy of Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (for neuroscience and molecular genetics research), the Salk Institute (for viral research), and the Scientists Institute for Public Information between 1968 and 1970;
(5) funded population control studies by Planned Parenthood-World Population, New York, N.Y.;
(6) funded the Community Blood Council of Greater New York, Inc., the 'council of doctors' who established the infamous New York City Blood Bank which allowed more than 10,000 hemophiliacs and countless others to become infected with HIV because they allegedly didn't want to spend $150 million to screen the blood;
(7) maintained Laurence S. Rockefeller, the director of the Community Blood Council of Greater New York the international blood bankers and the president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, as chairman of the board of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and a trustee for the Sloan Foundation;
(8) gave in excess of $20,000 annually to the Council on Foreign Relations; and
(9) maintained among its 'marketable securities,' 16,505 shares of Chase Manhattan Bank stock (in 1967, which it apparently sold by 1970 probably to avoid conflict of interest charges) along with 24,400-53,000 shares issued by Merck & Co., Inc. (the company whose President, George W. Merck, was director of America's biological weapons industry, and whose hepatitis B and polio vaccines most plausibly transmitted AIDS throughout the world).
Also in "Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola," you will learn exactly what was done with the $10 million Congress gave the DOD for the development of AIDS-like viruses, because I published the relevant contracts. You will learn that Dr. Robert Gallo, the famous NCI molecular biologist, pardoned by President Clinton last year for scientific fraud and misconduct, and credited with the discovery of the AIDS virus, set about to develop immune system ravaging, AIDS-like viruses, along with other Litton Bionetics researchers. You will learn that they took monkey viruses that were humanly benign, recombined them with DNA, RNA, and enzymes from other animal viruses that caused leukemias, lymphomas, and sarcomas, and then to get them to jump species, they cultured these new mutant viruses in human white blood cells in some studies, and human fetal tissue cells in other studies, to produce immune-system-destroying, cancer-causing viruses that could enter humans and produce virtually identical effects to what the AIDS virus is currently doing in people around the world.
Indeed, it was contaminated live viral vaccines that spread this disease and likely others, including chronic fatigue, certain leukemias, and possibly Gulf War Syndrome as well, to vast populations. In fact, today's live viral vaccines, including the oral polio vaccine required by law be given to our children, are still litered with simian (monkey) virus contaminants since they are developed in monkey kidney cells, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration turns a blind eye to as many as 100 live monkey virus contaminants per vaccine dose, and is barred from telling health professionals and even health scientists this truth because of pharmaceutical industry dictated proprietary laws and non-disclosure agreements.
In the end, the research question I asked, "Did these viruses, AIDS and Ebola, evolve naturally, were they accidentally produced, or were they intentionally created and deployed?" I conclude, unquestionably, they are not natural. I leave you the reader, and concerned citizens of America and the world, to decide whether it was a horrible accident or treacherous covert population control experiment.
I ask all of you to consider the pain and cost of the current and coming plagues,including the escalating rates of virus-linked cancers like prostate and breast cancer, certain leukemias and lymphomas, and other vaccine contaminant related illnesses including hyperactivity disorders in children and escalating sudden infant death rates. I believe you will realize that the pain and cost of denial and indifference to this horrible reality is far greater than the toll your political action might cost. I therefore urge you to join our growing grassroots network of health consumers, professionals, scientists, patriots, and concerned citizens in our search for answers and solutions. I urge you to help us pressure Congress for a full investigation of these published facts, and to allocate the funding needed to effect appropriate solutions to these urgent health care problems.
Let me end by giving you, and our home viewers, two resources to contact in this effort. The first is Tetrahedron's toll free citizen action and document order hotline 800-336-9266. And the other is our Internet web site address where you can link to various supporting organizations and individuals. That address is http://www.tetrahedron.org
Thank you very much, and God bless.