|
Home Methods Statements The
Liver
Iron
and Ribavirin Increased
Hepatic Iron Deposition Resulting From Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C
With Ribavirin
M. Isabel Fiel, MD,1 Thomas D. Schiano, MD,2 Maria Guido, MD,1 Swan N.
Thung, MD,1 Karen L. Lindsay, MD,3 Gary L. Davis, MD, 4 James H. Lewis,
MD,5 Leonard B. Seeff, MD,6 and Henry C. Bodenheimer, Jr, MD2
Key Words: Hemosiderosis; Viral hepatitis; Hepatitis C virus, Interferon
Abstract
Increased levels of hepatic iron may impair the response of patients with
chronic hepatitis C to treatment with interferon-alfa, but combination
therapy with ribavirin has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of
hepatitis C. When used alone or with interferon-alfa, ribavirin may cause
a dose-dependent reversible hemolytic anemia. We compared the extent and
cellular localization of iron deposition in liver tissue from biopsy
specimens obtained before and after 36 weeks of therapy with ribavirin or
placebo for 59 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Paired slides were
available for review from 26 ribavirin and 27 placebo recipients. Iron
deposition was assessed using coded slides stained with Perls Prussian
blue and was semiquantitated in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and areas of
fibrosis. The overall iron score fell by 0.96 in the placebo group and
increased 1.69 in the ribavirin recipients. Iron was deposited mainly in
hepatocytes; the hepatocyte iron score increased from 2.19 to 3.81 in the
ribavirin group. The amount of iron staining in Kupffer cells declined in
the placebo group and increased slightly in the ribavirin group. Iron
changes in areas of fibrosis were minor and did not differ between groups.
Increased total hepatic iron deposition occurred during a 9-month course
of ribavirin. Ribavirin-associated hemolysis deposits iron preferentially
in hepatocytes. This increased deposition of hepatic iron does not seem to
affect the biochemical or histologic response to ribavirin therapy but may
have implications for hepatocyte susceptibility to future injury.
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major causative factor
responsible for the development of cirrhosis. Significant iron deposition
occurs in cirrhosis secondary to any cause, but especially in HCV and
alcohol-related chronic liver disease.1 Increased iron deposition,
possibly related to the release of iron from injured hepatocytes, also is
observed in patients with HCV who do not have cirrhosis.2 High levels of
hepatic iron may negatively influence the response to interferon-alfa
therapy. 3-5 Lower hepatic iron concentration favors a beneficial response
to treatment. 3 Phlebotomy decreases serum aminotransferase activities in
patients with HCV and may improve the response to interferon-alfa in some
patients.6 Ribavirin, an oral purine nucleoside analog, has a broad
spectrum of antiviral activity.7,8 This drug, however, does not lower
hepatitis C viral titers.8-12 When used in combination with interferon-alfa
in the treatment of HCV, the rates of normalization of aminotransferase
values, viral eradication, and histologic improvement are higher than when
interferon-alfa is used alone.13-16 One major adverse effect of ribavirin
is a dose-dependent reversible hemolysis.8,9,15,17-20 Chronic
intravascular hemolysis typically leads to increased reticuloendothelial
cell iron deposition with little increase in hepatocyte iron. However,
ribavirin-induced hemolysis is postulated to occur extravascularly within
the reticuloendothelial system.21,22 Hepatic iron accumulation may
predispose liver cells to injury from oxidative stress. In addition, a
beneficial response to interferon-alfa may be blunted.15 We evaluated
stainable hepatic iron before and after ribavirin therapy of HCV. The
changes noted were correlated with the clinical response to ribavirin as
measured by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity. Materials and Methods
This project was part of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized,
controlled trial comparing ribavirin and placebo therapy in 59 patients
with HCV.12 Twenty-nine patients received ribavirin at a dose of 1,200
mg/d, and 30 patients received placebo for a duration of 36 weeks. Liver
biopsies were performed within 6 months before enrollment and at the end
of therapy. Patients were not taking iron supplements and had no history
of hemochromatosis or porphyria cutanea tarda. No patient had a history of
chronic or hemolytic anemia, and none were using alcohol. Fifty-three
paired slides were available and coded, 26 from the ribavirin group and 27
from the placebo group. Perls Prussian blue staining for trivalent iron
was applied on 5-µm-thick sections of the liver biopsy specimens. Two
pathologists (M.I.F. and M.G.), blinded to the identity of the treatment
group and to whether biopsy specimens were obtained before or after
treatment, reviewed the slides. Quantitative and qualitative scores for
hepatic iron deposition were determined by consensus. Stainable iron was
assessed by using the semiquantitative grading system proposed by
Tirmann-Schmelzer with modifications.23 Brissot and
coworkers23
demonstrated this method to be reflective of hepatic iron concentration
because it takes into account the different iron storage areas of the
hepatic lobule. Briefly, hepatocyte iron, Kupffer cell iron, and areas of
fibrosis were assessed and given scores ranging from 0 to 4 arriving at an
elementary score A. The hepatocyte score is multiplied by a coefficient of
3, and all 3 scores are then cumulated (score B). The scores are based on
the number and percentage of cells containing iron and the areas of iron
deposits. The histologic iron estimation included determination of the
intensity of iron load according to the following scores: 1, sparse, fine
granules; 2, patchy, fine granules; 3, diffuse, fine granules; and 4,
diffuse, coarse granules. Total iron scores (score B), hepatocyte iron
scores, and Kupffer cell iron scores before and after treatment were
compared within each group and then between the 2 treatment groups by
using Fisher exact test for statistical analysis. The ALT response at the
end of therapy was correlated with change in iron scores. The definition
of a positive therapeutic response was normalization of ALT activity at
the end of therapy. Other parameters evaluated included mean hemoglobin
and reticulocyte count before and after treatment.Results are expressed as
mean ± SD with range (minimum and maximum).Results
Hemoglobin levels decreased by a mean of 13% (range, 0-4 g/dL [0-40 g/L])
in the ribavirin treated group. A decline in the hemoglobin level of more
than 2 g/dL (20 g/L) occurred in 79% of patients receiving ribavirin; a
decline of 4 g/dL (40 g/L) or more was observed in 21% of patients. No
appreciable decrease in the hemoglobin level was noted in the placebo
group. The reticulocyte count increased by a mean of 6.9% at the end of
treatment in the ribavirin-treated patients.The semiquantitative
evaluation of iron deposition in stained slides is shown in [ Table
1 ] . The overall iron score at week 0 in the ribavirin-treated group
was 3.04 ± 3.75 (range, 0-12), and the overall iron score at week 36 was
4.73 ± 4.03 (range, 0-12). The difference in total iron scores increased
from week 0 to week 36 by 1.69. In the placebo group, the overall iron
score at week 0 was 3.74 and at week 36 was 2.77, demonstrating a slight
decline of 0.97 by the conclusion of the study.The hepatocyte iron score
in the ribavirin-treated group at the time of enrollment was 2.19 ± 3.75
(range, 0-2), and at week 36, the score was 3.81 ± 4.03 (range, 0-12)
(Table 1). The difference between week 0 and week 36 was 1.62. In the
placebo group, the hepatocyte iron score at week 0 was 2.56 ± 4.07
(range, 0-12), and at week 36, the hepatocyte iron score was 2.0 ± 3.43
(range, 0-11). The score of Kupffer cell iron deposition in the ribavirin
treated group at baseline was 0.81 ± 1.06 (range, 0-3), and at week 36,
it was 0.92 ± 1.06 (range, 0-3). In the placebo group, the Kupffer cell
iron score at week 0 was 0.89 ± 0.97 (range, 0-3), and at week 36, the
score was 0.52 ± 0.70 (range, 0-2) (Table 1). [ Image
1 ] and [ Image
2 ] demonstrate the change in iron deposition before and after
treatment. Normalization of ALT at week 36 did not correlate with the
total amount of iron deposition nor change in iron scores [ Table
2 ] and [ Table
3 ].Discussion
HCV infection often progresses to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and
hepatocellular carcinoma. At present, interferon-alfa is the only therapy
approved for treatment of HCV infection. 24 However, approximately 50% of
those treated have no response, and of the patients who show response, 50%
to 80% will experience relapse within 6 months of discontinuation of
therapy.25 Combined treatment with interferon-alfa and ribavirin has shown
promise for normalizing serum aminotransferase values and decreasing the
degree of histologic damage in patients with HCV.13,14,26,27Distribution
of iron in the liver and the amount of iron deposition may have an
influence on the patient's response to interferon-alfa therapy.3-5 In a
study by Barton et al,4 total hepatic iron scores were higher in patients
with incomplete response. In addition, Olynyk et al3 reported that hepatic
iron concentration has an influence on the response to therapy for chronic
hepatitis C with interferon-alfa. Ribavirin has been used for many years as
a treatment for respiratory syncytial virus infection.28 Its predominant
adverse effect is dose-dependent hemolysis and resulting anemia.16-20
Declines in hematocrit may range from 10% to 13% (0.10-0.13) with a
compensatory increase in reticulocyte counts8,9 and an increase in total
serum bilirubin. 10 The mechanism of this hemolysis is thought to relate
to the RBC accumulation of ribavirin triphosphate.21,22 The increased
hepatic iron deposition likely results from uptake of iron released from
destroyed RBCs. Di Bisceglie and coworkers2 also have postulated that
ribavirin may cause increased iron absorption from the gastrointestinal
tract. In their study of ribavirin effects, iron staining was noted to
increase in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells after ribavirin treatment, but
there was no change in the relative cellular distribution of iron. Iron
released intravascularly due to hemolysis likely would be taken up mainly
by Kupffer cells. In the present study and work by others,2 iron staining
also was seen within hepatocytes. The degree of increased iron deposition
seems greater within hepatocytes than other liver cells. Ferritin that
accumulates in Kupffer cells as a consequence of RBC uptake and
destruction subsequently may be transferred to adjacent hepatocytes. An
elegant study done by Sibille et al29 showed iron, in the form of ferritin,
being released by the phagocytosing Kupffer cells and rapidly taken up by
hepatocytes. We believe this may explain why, in the present study, more
abundant iron deposition was found in hepatocytes. Piperno and colleagues30
postulated that iron overload may contribute to persistent HCV infection
by supplying the virus with essential nutrients and by producing immune
alteration that impairs recovery. This may become important over time in
ribavirin-treated patients if hepatic iron deposition continues to
increase.2 Hepatic iron stores increased significantly in patients treated
with ribavirin compared with those treated with placebo. This increase was
demonstrated by using an evaluation of histologic hepatic iron that
correlates with the hepatic iron concentration.2,23 Change in ALT levels
during ribavirin therapy was not related to iron deposition before
treatment or to liver iron levels after therapy. The long-term effects of
increased hepatic iron stores secondary to ribavirin treatment remain to
be evaluated. As longer courses of treatment and long-term maintenance
therapy with ribavirin alone or in combination with interferon-alfa are
contemplated, excessive amounts of iron in the liver could limit the
usefulness of ribavirin. Accumulated iron deposition within the liver
might reach excessive levels during prolonged treatment, especially in
patients with high preexisting concentrations of hepatic iron.
From the 1 The Lillian and Henry M. Stratton-Hans Popper Department of
Pathology and the 2Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, The
Mount Sinai Medical Center of the City University of New York, New York,
NY; the 3Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Department of
Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; the 4Section
of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Florida,
Gainesville; the 5Division of Liver Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology,
Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington,
DC; and the 6National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.Presented at The
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Annual Meeting,
Chicago, IL, November 1995. Published in abstract form in Hepatology.
1995;22:291A. Address reprint requests to Dr Bodenheimer: Division of Liver
Diseases, Dept of Medicine, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave
Levy Place, New York, NY 10029.
References
Bacon BR. Diagnosis and management of hemochromatosis. Gastroenterology.
1997;13:995-999.
Di Bisceglie AM, Bacon BR, Kleiner DE, et al. Increase in hepatic iron
stores following prolonged therapy with ribavirin in patients with chronic
hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 1994;21:1109-1112.
Olynyk JK, Reddy KR, Di Bisceglie AM, et al. Hepatic iron concentration as
a predictor of response to interferon alfa therapy in chronic hepatitis C.
Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1104-1109.
Barton AL, Banner BF, Cable EE, et al. Distribution of iron in the liver
predicts the response of chronic hepatitis C infection to interferon
therapy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:419-424.
Clemente MG, Congia M, Lai ME, et al. Effect of iron overload on the
response to recombinant interferon-alfa treatment in transfusion-dependent
patients with thalassemia major and chronic hepatitis C. J Pediatr.
1994;125:123-128.
Hayashi H, Takikawa T, Nishimura N, et al. Improvement of serum
aminotransferase levels after phlebotomy in patients with chonic active
hepatitis C and excess hepatic iron. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:986-988.
Patterson JL, Fernandez-Larsson R. Molecular mechanisms of action of
ribavirin. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:1139-1146.
Fried MW, Fong T-L, Swain MG, et al. Therapy of chronic hepatitis B with a
6-month course of ribavirin. J Hepatol. 1994;21:145-150.
Di Bisceglie AM, Shindo M, Fong T-L, et al. A pilot study of ribavirin
therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1992;16:649-654.
Di Bisceglie AM, Conjeevaran HS, Fried MW, et al. Ribavirin as therapy for
chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:897-903.
Dusheiko G, Main J, Thomas H, et al. Ribavirin treatment for patients with
chronic hepatitis C: results of a placebo-controlled study. J Hepatol.
1996;25:591-598.
Bodenheimer HC, Lindsay KL, Davis GL, et al. Tolerance and efficacy of
oral ribavirin treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a multicenter trial.
Hepatology. 1997;26:473-477.
Brillanti S, Garson J, Mauro F, et al. A pilot study of combination
therapy with ribavirin plus interferon-alpha for interferon-alpha
resistant chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:812-817.
Schvarcz R, Yun ZB, Sonnenberg A, et al. Combined treatment with
interferon alpha 2b and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients with
a previous non-response or non-sustained response to interferon alone. J
Med Virol. 1995;46:43-47.
Bizollon T, Palazzo U, Ducerf C, et al. Pilot study of the combination of
interferon alfa and ribavirin therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver
transplantation. Hepatology. 1997;26:500-504.
Reichard O, Schvarcz R, Weiland O. Therapy of hepatitis C:
alpha-interferon and ribavirin. Hepatology. 1997;26(suppl):108S-111S.
Camps J, Garcia N, Riezu-Boz JI, et al. Ribavirin in the treatment of
chronic hepatitis C unresponsive to alfa interferon. J Hepatol.
1993;19:408-412.
Kakumu S, Yoshioka K, Wakita T, et al. A pilot study of ribavirin and
interferon beta for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology.
1993;105:507-512.
Reichard O, Andersson J, Schvarcz R, et al. Ribavirin treatment for
chronic hepatitis C. Lancet. 1991;337:1058-1061.
Schulman NR. Assessment of hematologic effects of ribavirin in humans. In:
Smith RA, Knight V, Smith JA, eds. Clinical Applications of Ribavirin.
Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1984:79-92.
Canonico PG, Kende M, Huggins JW. The toxicology and pharmacology of
ribavirin in experimental animals. In: Smith RA, Knight V, Smith JA, eds.
Clinical Applications of Ribavirin. Orlando, FL: Academic Press;
1984:65-77.
Canonico PG, Kastello MD, Cosgriff TM, et al. Hematological and bone
marrow effects of ribavirin in Rhesus monkeys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol.
1984;74:163-172.
Brissot P, Bourel M, Herry D, et al. Assessment of liver iron content in
271 patients: a reevaluation of direct and indirect methods.
Gastroenterology. 1981;80:557-565.
Davis GL, Lau JJ, Lim HL. Therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterol
Clin North Am. 1994;23:603-613.
Davis GL, Balant LA, Schiff ER, et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C
with recombinant interferon alfa: a multicenter randomized controlled
trial. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1501-1506.
Chemello L, Cavaletto L, Bernardinello E, et al. The effect of interferon
alfa and ribavirin combination therapy in naive patients with chronic
hepatitis C. J Hepatol. 1995;23(suppl):8-12.
Braconer J, Paulsen O, Engman K, et al. Combined alpha-interferon and
ribavirin treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Scand J
Infect Dis. 1995;27:325-329.
Gilbert BE, Knight V. Biochemistry and clinical applications of ribavirin.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;30:201-205.
Sibille J-C, Kondo H, Aisen P. Interactions between isolated hepatocytes
and Kupffer cells in iron metabolism: a possible role for ferritin as an
iron carrier protein. Hepatology. 1988;8:296-301.
Piperno A, Fargion S, D'Alba R, et al. Liver damage in Italian patients
with hereditary hemochromatosis is highly influenced by hepatitis B and C
virus infection. J Hepatol. 1992;16:364-368.
Liver iron
accumulation in chronic hepatitis C patients without HFE mutations:
relationships with histological damage, viral load and genotype and -glutathione
S-transferase levels
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY &
HEPATOLOGY 2001;13:1355-1361 November 2001 Edoardo
Gianninia; Luca Mastraccib; Federica Bottaa; Paola Romagnolia; Alberto
Fasolia; Domenico Rissoc; Francesca Faravellid; Paola Ceppab; Pasquale B.
Lantieric; Gian Carlo Icardic; Roberto Testaa Gastroenterology Unit,
aDepartment of Internal Medicine, bDepartment of Pathology and cDepartment
of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, and dDivision of Human Genetics,
Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
Background Host and viral factors
have been suggested as possible causative factors for the presence of
liver iron accumulation in chronic hepatitis C. However, there is no
agreement regarding the influence of liver iron accumulation on the
biochemical and histological severity of chronic hepatitis C.
Moreover, data concerning the relationships between both viral load and
genotype and liver iron accumulation are scanty. Aims: To evaluate the
biochemical, histological and virological assessment of a group of chronic
hepatitis C patients without risk factors for iron overload, on the basis
of the presence, degree and distribution of liver iron accumulation.
Methods: Fifty-three chronic hepatitis C patients (34 men, 19 women; age
44 ± 11 years) with no risk factors for liver iron accumulation and
showing no HFE mutations were chosen from a broader cohort of chronic
hepatitis C patients. The presence, degree and distribution of liver iron
accumulation were assessed using Deugnier's score. Relationships between
the presence of liver iron accumulation and grading and staging were
carried out separately. Hepatitis C virus RNA serum levels and viral
genotype were compared in patients with or without liver iron
accumulation. Alpha glutathione S-transferase serum levels were assessed
in all patients. Results: Overall, liver iron accumulation was mild and
was present in 19 patients (36%). It was associated with male gender (P =
0.0358), and was reflected by high serum iron levels (P = 0.001) and high
ferritin levels (P < 0.0001). Hepatitis C virus RNA levels and genotype
were not associated with the presence of liver iron accumulation. In
multivariate analysis, ferritin was the only variable significantly
associated with liver iron accumulation (P < 0.0001). Grading was
higher in patients with liver iron accumulation regardless of the site of
iron deposition. Fibrosis was present in all patients with iron overload;
these patients were more frequently cirrhotic. Moreover, patients with
mesenchymal or mixed deposition had higher staging than patients with
hepatocytic or no iron deposition. This feature was reflected by higher -glutathione
S-transferase levels. Conclusions:
Liver iron accumulation is mild in chronic hepatitis C patients without
HFE mutations and is mainly reflected by serum ferritin levels.
Viral characteristics do not seem to play a role in iron deposition. Liver
iron accumulation is associated with higher grading, advanced fibrosis and
cirrhosis. Moreover, higher staging is associated with mesenchymal or
mixed iron deposition. In these patients, higher -glutathione S-transferase
levels seem to reflect more complex damage. http://www.transplantjournal.com/
Iron as a Comorbid Factor in
Chronic Viral Hepatitis
Herbert L. Bonkovsky, M.D. American Journal
of Gastroenterology January 2002 Volume 97, Number 1
Pages 1-4
Iron is an abundant element of the earth, and it
has served an essential role in the emergence of oxygen-based plant and
animal life on our planet.
Deficiency of iron is the most common cause of anemia and, when severe, is
associated with many symptoms and signs. To help prevent such occurrences,
virtually all forms of life on earth have developed schemes and means to
assure their acquisition and retention of iron. In fact, we humans have
virtually no natural means of excreting excess iron, probably because, for
most of our natural history as an evolving species, we were more prone to
problems related to iron deficiency than to iron excess.
The situation for some of us has changed
dramatically during the past couple of millennia, with the emergence of
iron overload or hemochromatosis as a common condition.
Indeed primary, or hereditary, hemochromatosis is the most common inborn
error of metabolism among whites from central and northern Europe.
Most causes of hereditary hemochromatosis are due to a single homozygous
mutation (nt: g845a) of the HFE gene, which produces the now familiar
substitution of tyrosine for cysteine at amino acid 282 of the HFE protein
[the C282Y mutation. Most men and at least one third of women who are
C282Y +/+, if undiscovered and untreated, will develop pathological iron
overload.
Hereditary or acquired hemochromatosis may also occur as a result of other
mutations of HFE [especially H63D and S65C, as a result of mutations in
other genes involved in iron metabolism [e.g., ferroprotein or hepcidin,
or as a result of dyserythropoietic anemias, the most important of which
are the thalassemias.
Regardless of cause, excess iron is toxic and
potentially fatal, and the liver, which in all forms of hemochromatosis is
the major organ for iron storage, is the principal site of iron-mediated
toxicity.
Thus, iron overload per se may cause hepatic
fibrosis, cirrhosis, decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Indeed,
the latter complication of cirrhosis is especially common in
hemochromatosis
Iron as a Comorbid Factor in Non-hemochromatotic Liver Disease
Evidence continues to mount indicating that lesser amounts of iron,
even so-called normal amounts, may increase hepatic injury due to
causes unrelated to iron.
Chief among these are porphyria cutanea tarda, steatohepatitis, and
chronic viral hepatitis.
In addition, heavy hepatic iron overload
sometimes develops in advanced liver disease, regardless of
underlying cause, and/or in patients with spontaneous or surgically
constructed portosystemic shunts ("shunt siderosis").
The reasons that such nonhemochromatotic
iron overload develops in some patients are not yet understood, but
based upon our current notions of iron-mediated tissue injury, when
such iron overload does occur, it probably increases morbidity and
mortality of the primary, underlying liver disease.
|
Iron and Viral Hepatitis
A link between iron and viral hepatitis was first stressed a
generation ago by Blumberg and colleagues, who noted that the
outcome of acute hepatitis B was correlated with levels of serum
iron and ferritin. Specifically, patients with higher levels of
serum iron or ferritin were found less likely to recover
spontaneously from acute hepatitis B infection.
Shortly after the hepatitis C virus had
been cloned and methods for its unequivocal detection established,
it was noted that many patients with "chronic hepatitis C"
(CHC) had elevations in serum ferritin.
These increases did not seem to be due solely to the fact that serum
ferritin is an acute phase reactant. Elevations in serum iron
saturations were less frequent but also noted.
In the great majority of patients with
elevated serum ferritin and/or iron saturation in whom 'hepatic iron
concentrations' (HICs) were also measured, the HICs were within the
normal range or, at most, only mildly increased (<3-fold above
the upper limit of normal) and thus not usually thought to be
hepatotoxic.
In several careful histopathological
studies it was shown that the lobular and cellular distribution of
stainable iron in the liver was correlated with therapeutic
responses to interferon.
Specifically, the presence of cells in portal tracts (stromal and
endothelial lining cells) that stained positive for iron was
associated with reduced responses to interferon.
The iron staining was an independent and significant inverse
correlate of therapeutic response, on a par with viral genotype and
load.
In the 1990s higher levels of serum
ferritin or HICs were variably associated with decreased likelihood
of responding to standard, short-acting interferons, at the time the
only effective antiviral therapy for CHC.
Unfortunately, the effectiveness of such therapy is limited, and the
costs and side effects are high.
Therefore, it was a natural next step to suggest that iron reduction
therapy might be of benefit to increase the response rates to
interferon therapy. Indeed, this hypothesis has been confirmed in at
least three prospective, randomized, controlled trials. *
* Fong TL, Han SH, Tsai NCS, et al. A pilot
randomized, controlled trial of the effect of iron depletion on long
term response to alpha-interferon in patients with chronic hepatitis
C. J Hepatol 1998;28:369-74.
* Fontana RJ, Israel J, LeClair P, et al. Iron reduction before and
during interferon therapy of chronic hepatitis C: Results of a
multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology 2000;31:730-6.
* Fargion S, Ballare M, Belloni G, et al. Iron depletion and
interferon therapy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial in
untreated non-cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C.
Hepatology 1999;30:371A
In another United States multicenter trial,
patients with CHC who previously had failed to respond to interferon
were randomized to receive iron reduction alone versus iron
reduction plus additional interferon.
Neither group achieved significant improvements in terms of cure of
CHC, but both showed evidence of histological improvements, with
less severe hepatic inflammation. *
* DiBisceglie AM, Bonkovsky HL, Chopra S,
et al. Iron reduction as an adjuvant to interferon therapy in
patients with chronic hepatitis C who have previously not responded
to interferon: A multi-center, prospective, randomized, controlled
trial. Hepatology 2000;32:135-8.
These favorable effects of iron reduction
alone confirmed and extended earlier reports showing significant
improvements in serum ALT levels in patients with CHC who previously
had not responded to interferon when they underwent iron reduction
by therapeutic venesection. There were even suggestions that iron
chelation therapy of only modest intensity improved CHC. *
* Hayashi H. Takikawa T, Nishimura N, et
al. Improvement of serum aminotransferase levels after phlebotomy in
patients with chronic active hepatitis C and excess hepatic iron. Am
J Gastroenterol 1994;89:986-8.
* Sampietro PA, D'Alba M, Roffi L, et al. Iron stores, response to
interferon therapy, and effects of iron depletion in chronic
hepatitis C. Liver 1996;16:248-54.
|
Iron Reduction for Long Term
Management of Chronic Viral Hepatitis
During the past decade, we have made clinically important advances
in our management of chronic viral hepatitis, with the development
of interferon and/or lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B and of
interferon plus ribavirin for CHC (Chronic Hepatitis C).
The recent introduction of pegylated interferons plus ribavirin has
improved the therapeutic response rates further, so that we can now
expect to cure more than 50% of patients who are able to afford and
to tolerate such combination therapy for 1 yr.
However, the glass still is only half full.
What therapy should be offered to those who can not afford or
tolerate such medicines or who have not responded?
Specifically, might long term iron reduction be of benefit to such
patients? In this issue, Yano et al. (*) provide evidence that the
answer to this question is "Yes."
They report the results of 29 patients with CHC whom they enrolled
into a study of iron reduction between July, 1991 and December,
1993. They excluded people who admitted to drinking more than 40 g
of ethanol per day, those who had been transfused more than 5 U of
blood, and those with anemia or "decompensated liver
cirrhosis." Therapeutic venesections of 200-400 ml of blood
were performed every 2-4 wk, until an iron-depleted state was
reached (serum ferritin < 11 ng/ml). Twenty-six of the 29 were
then treated with standard interferon (details of regimen not
stated).
The percentage of patients who achieved a fall in serum ALT into the
"normal" range was significantly higher in the iron
reduction group than in controls.
Four of 26 (15%) experienced sustained virological responses and
were excluded from the study. (This rate of sustained virological
response was "not significantly different" than that of
historical controls, but numbers of patients studied and other
details were not provided.)
Thirteen of 25 patients agreed to undergo
baseline and 5-yr follow-up liver biopsies. Twelve of these were
nonsustained virological responders, and the 13th did not receive
any interferon, but was treated by iron reduction alone.
Thirteen controls were selected from among patients at the authors'
hospitals who had been nonresponders to interferon without iron
reduction and who had undergone two liver biopsies at least 3 yr
apart. The iron reduction and control groups were reasonably well
matched, although there is concern because the study was not a
prospective, randomized, controlled trial analyzed on an
intention-to-treat basis.
The mean serum levels of ALT, in the
phlebotomy group, fell from 117 to 75 IU/L and remained less than 72
IU/L for the ensuing 5 yr, during which time additional phlebotomies
were needed every 8 months or so to maintain an iron-depleted state.
There were no adverse effects of chronic iron reduction.
Of greatest importance, the severity of
fibrosis (by the Desmet scoring system) in the iron reduction group
decreased from 2.3 to 1.7 (p < 0.05), whereas in controls the
mean values were 1.7 at baseline and 2.0 at follow-up (p > 0.05,
ns).
Furthermore, the severity of inflammation increased in only one of
13 of the chronic iron reduction group (unchanged in 12/13; mean
values = 1.8 and 2.0, p > 0.05), whereas it increased in 12/13
controls (unchanged in the 13th) (mean values = 2.0 and 2.9, p <
0.005).
The authors concluded that long term
maintenance of iron depletion by therapeutic phlebotomy prevents
progression of fibrosis in CHC.
They suggest that chronic iron reduction is
a good alternative to interferon in treatment of CHC.
To these positive results may be added
recent reports of decreases in serum -fetoprotein (**) and less
frequent development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (***) in
small groups of patients with CHC chronically treated with iron
reduction.
The notion that iron in the liver is a risk factor for HCC is
supported by the known cocarcinogenicity of iron and by a recent
report showing a 5.2-fold increased risk of HCC development in
patients with cirrhotic CHC and hepatic iron deposition relative to
those without (****).
Although these important results from our
Japanese colleagues (*) need confirmation in prospective, randomized
trials involving larger numbers of patients, they are nevertheless
supportive of earlier results from Japan and several other countries
and consistent with emerging notions of iron as a comorbid factor
adversely influencing non-hemochromatotic liver disease.
Currently, we should certainly continue
first to try to eradicate all detectable hepatitis C virus from
patients with CHC, absent contraindications to the use of pegylated
interferon plus ribavirin. Those who fail to respond to such therapy
or who can not tolerate it should be considered for enrollment into
prospective randomized trials of iron reduction.
It would be a bit complicated to use iron reduction therapy in
combination with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin because of the
propensity of ribavirin to accumulate as the triphosphate in
erythrocytes and to cause hemolysis.
Indeed, the hemolytic anemia, increased GI iron absorption, and
increased hepatic iron produced by ribavirin may diminish its
efficacy in CHC (*****).
A trial comparing therapeutic venesection
to the use of iron chelation therapy, especially with oral iron
chelators such as deferiprone, seems indicated and worthy of
support.
Such studies will need to be of long duration (>4 yr) and to
involve clinical and histopathological endpoints. They should
especially involve patients with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis,
because they will be at greatest risk for complications and death
due to CHC.
If the current National Institutes of
Health-sponsored Hepatitis C Antiviral Long Term Treatment to
Prevent Cirrhosis Trial (HALT-C) (******) and/or similar trials show
that long term low-dose pegylated interferon is of benefit in
therapy of patients with difficult to treat, advanced CHC, and if
chronic iron reduction is also shown to be of benefit, we will have
two new modalities of chronic therapy to consider and perhaps even
to combine and/or compare.
Emerging evidence suggests that we would
all be better off if we were a bit low in iron (stopping short of
iron deficiency anemia).
Those of us without chronic viral hepatitis
(or other contraindications) should be volunteer blood donors.
We should consider long term iron reduction
for patients with chronic viral hepatitis who have failed to
tolerate or respond to antiviral therapies. By so doing, we may be
able to loosen the icy grip of "cold iron" on us and
especially on our patients with chronic fibrotic liver disease,
including chronic viral hepatitis.
* Yano M, Hayashi H, Wakusawa S, et al.
Long term effects of phlebotomy on biochemical and histological
parameters of chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:133-7.
** Lurie Y, Beer-Gabel M, Malnick SDH, et
al. Phlebotomy lowers serum ALT and alphafetoprotein levels in
patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1997;26:215A
*** Hayashi H, Wakusawa T, Takikawa T, et
al, Long-term effect of iron removal on chronic hepatitis C.
Hepatology 1997;26:215A
****Chapoutot C, Esslimani M, Joomaye Z, et
al. Liver iron excess in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
developed on viral C cirrhosis. Gut 2000;46:711-4
*****DiBisceglie AM, Bacon BR, Kleiner DE,
et al. Increase in hepatic iron stores following prolonged therapy
with ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol
1994;21:1109-12.
******Shiffman ML. Retreatment of
interferon and interferon-ribavirin non-responders with PEG
interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin: Initial results from the lead-in
phase of the HALT-C Trial. Hepatology 2001;34(4, pt 2):243A
Reprint requests and correspondence:
Herbert L. Bonkovsky, M.D., Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and
Nutrition, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake
Avenue North, Room S-6-737, Worcester, MA 01655-0002.
2002 the American College of Gastroenterology
Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
http://www-east.elsevier.com/ajg/issues/9701/ajg5390edi.htm
|
|
|