|
Home Methods Statements The
Liver
DIABETES and
HCV
General Practitioners must be made aware!
"HCV patients were more than 11 times as likely as those without
infection to develop diabetes"
Insulin
resistance is associated with chronic hepatitis C and virus infection
fibrosis progression
Gastroenterology
December 2003, Volume 125, Number 6
Jason M. Hui
ABSTRACT/SUMMARY
Background & Aims: Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is associated with
an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes. We hypothesized that
virus-induced insulin resistance may be a mechanism for fibrogenesis in
chronic hepatitis C virus infection.
Methods: In 260 hepatitis C virus-infected subjects, we examined the
relationship between histological findings and anthropometric and
biochemical data, including insulin resistance determined by the
homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). We also compared fasting serum
insulin, C peptide, and HOMA-IR levels between the subset of 121 hepatitis
C virus patients with stage 0 or 1 hepatic fibrosis and 137 healthy
volunteers matched by sex, body mass index, and waist-hip ratio.
Results: Hepatitis C virus-infected subjects with stage 0 or 1 hepatic
fibrosis had higher levels of insulin, C peptide, and HOMA-IR (all P=0.01)
compared with matched healthy controls. In the 250 hepatitis C virus
patients (fibrosis stage 0 to 4), viral genotype and portal, but not
lobular, inflammation were univariate predictors of HOMA-IR. By multiple
linear regression analysis, independent predictors of HOMA-IR included
body mass index (P < 0.001), previous failed antiviral treatment (P <
0.001), portal inflammatory grade (P < 0.001), and genotype 3 status (P =
0.01). Genotype 3 had significantly lower HOMA-IR than other genotypes
(which were comparable when adjusted for effects of the remaining
independent predictors). HOMA-IR was an independent predictor for the
degree of fibrosis (P < 0.001) and the rate of fibrosis progression (P =
0.03).
Conclusions: Hepatitis C virus may induce insulin resistance irrespective
of the severity of liver disease, and this effect seems to be genotype
specific. Further, our findings support the hypothesis that insulin
resistance may contribute to fibrotic progression in chronic hepatitis C
virus infection.
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence suggests that chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is
associated with an increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes.
Thus, type 2 diabetes is more prevalent among patients with chronic HCV
compared with those with other liver diseases and the general population,
irrespective of whether cirrhosis is present. Likewise, HCV seropositivity
among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is higher than in the general
population, a finding that has been validated for different ethnic groups.
Finally, even if liver function is restored by transplantation, post-liver
transplantation diabetes mellitus occurs more frequently among patients
who undergo transplantation for HCV than for other conditions.
Insulin resistance (IR) plays a primary role in the development of type 2
diabetes mellitus. This is supported by prospective longitudinal studies
showing that IR is the best predictor for the development of diabetes,
preceding the onset of diabetes by 10 to 20 years, and by cross-sectional
studies showing that IR is a consistent finding in patients with type 2
diabetes. In view of the strong association between HCV infection and the
development of diabetes mellitus, it is important to determine whether HCV
infection can predispose to the development of IR before diabetes occurs.
Such a potential link is particularly cogent in light of recent data that
indicate that diabetes may be associated with increased fibrosis
progression in patients with chronic HCV infection. In this study, we
tested the hypothesis that HCV infection itself may promote IR, by
comparing the degree of IR (determined by fasting glucose, insulin, and C
peptide levels and the homeostasis model [HOMA-IR]) between HCV-infected
individuals and healthy volunteers. We then examined whether histological
markers of HCV activity (portal and lobular inflammation) were associated
with HOMA-IR and whether there were genotype-specific alterations in the
extent of HOMA-IR. Finally, we assessed whether such virus-induced IR may
be a mechanism for fibrogenesis in chronic HCV infection, by determining
the relationship between the magnitude of HOMA-IR and the severity of
hepatic fibrosis and the rate of fibrosis progression.
Case selection
This study comprised 260 consecutive patients with chronic HCV who
underwent liver biopsy at Westmead Hospital between May 1999 and August
2002. Some of these cases (n = 117) have been the subject of a previous
report. All subjects had antibodies against HCV (Monolisa anti-HCV; Sanofi
Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and detectable HCV RNA by
polymerase chain reaction (Amplicor HCV; Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg,
NJ). HCV genotyping was performed with a second-generation reverse
hybridization line probe assay (Inno-Lipa HCV II; Innogenetics,
Zwijndrecht, Belgium). Thirty-three subjects (13%) had previous antiviral
therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon monotherapy [n = 30] or
combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin [n = 3]) and either were
nonresponders (n = 20) or had relapsed after treatment (n = 13). Liver
biopsies were performed at least 6 months after the completion of
antiviral therapy (median, 5 years; range, 0.5–10 years). No patient had
clinical evidence of hepatic decompensation (hepatic encephalopathy,
ascites, variceal bleeding, or serum bilirubin level greater than 2-fold
the upper limit of normal).
Clinical and laboratory assessment
The following data were collected at the time of liver biopsy: age, sex,
ethnicity, average current daily alcohol intake (g/day) in the past 6
months, past alcohol intake (g/day) before the last 6 months, weight,
height, and waist-hip ratio (WHR; waist circumference at umbilicus/hip
circumference at the maximal circumference over the buttocks). Body mass
index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms/height in square meters.
Past exposure to HBV was determined by the presence of HBV core antibody.
The estimated duration of infection was defined as the time elapsed from
the presumed date of infection to the date of liver biopsy. The former was
estimated as follows: the date of transfusion of blood products (before
1990), the first year of intravenous drug use, or the date of a single
specific and convincing parenteral exposure (e.g., needlestick injury). We
defined fibrosis progression per year as the ratio of the fibrosis stage
by the Scheuer score to the estimated duration of infection in years.
After an overnight fast of 12 hours, venous blood was drawn to determine
the serum levels of albumin, bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT),
aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ALT/AST ratio, -glutamyltransferase (GGT),
ferritin, cholesterol, insulin and C peptide, plasma glucose
concentration, platelet count, and international normalized ratio. Serum
insulin was determined by radioimmunoassay (Phadaseph Insulin RIA;
Pharmacia and Upjohn Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Serum C peptide was
estimated by a competitive immunoassay (IMMULITE; Diagnostic Products, Los
Angeles, CA). All other biochemical tests were determined by automated
procedures in the clinical pathology laboratories of Westmead Hospital. IR
was determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) method by using
the following equation: Insulin resistance(HOMA-IR)=Fasting insulin(µU/mL)xFasting
glucose(mmol/L)/22.5 IR calculated by this method has been validated
against insulin sensitivity measured directly with the euglycemic/hyperinsulinemic
clamp technique in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. To take into
account the effect of advanced hepatic fibrosis on increasing serum
insulin levels that is partly due to impaired insulin clearance, we
determined insulin secretion by using the serum C peptide-insulin ratio. C
peptide and insulin are secreted in equimolar amounts, and serum C peptide
is not significantly cleared by the liver; hence, the C peptide-insulin
ratio allows hyperinsulinemia due to impaired insulin degradation (low
ratio) to be distinguished from insulin hypersecretion (normal ratio).
The following conditions were excluded, as described previously:
concurrent active hepatitis B virus (HBV; positive for hepatitis B surface
antigen) or human immunodeficiency virus infection, autoimmune hepatitis,
primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), sclerosing cholangitis, hemochromatosis,
1-antitrypsin deficiency, and Wilson’s disease. Patients with an
established diagnosis of diabetes mellitus were excluded from this study.
The study protocol was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the
Western Sydney Area Health Service, and written, informed consent was
obtained.
Histopathology
The degree of necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis were scored
semiquantitatively as described by Scheuer by an experienced
hepatopathologist ( J. G. K.) blinded to the clinical data. Portal or
periportal and lobular inflammatory activities were both scored from 0 to
4. Fibrosis was scored as follows: F0, no fibrosis; F1, enlarged fibrotic
portal tracts; F2, periportal or portal-portal septa, but intact
architecture; F3, architectural distortion but no obvious cirrhosis; and
F4, probable or definite cirrhosis. Steatosis was assessed as the
percentage of hepatocytes containing macrovesicular fat droplets. It was
graded as 0 (no steatosis), 1 (<33% of hepatocytes affected), 2 (33%–66%
of hepatocytes affected), or 3 (>66% of hepatocytes affected).
Case controls: healthy volunteers
One hundred thirty-seven apparently healthy volunteers with normal liver
function tests and no known history of diabetes mellitus were enrolled.
They were matched by sex, BMI, and WHR with the 121 HCV-infected subjects
with minimal (stage 1) or no (stage 0) hepatic fibrosis. Markers of IR
(fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and C peptide) were compared between
these 2 groups of matched subjects.
Case controls: primary biliary cirrhosis
Twenty-four subjects with PBC and no known history of diabetes mellitus
were identified from the Westmead Hospital database. The liver biopsy
samples of these subjects were reviewed (by J. G. K). To allow comparison
with the HCV cases, the fibrosis stage of these biopsy samples was scored
by Scheuer’s method; all had fibrosis stages 1 to 3, and none had
cirrhosis. The markers of IR (fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and C
peptide) were compared among the PBC subjects, the HCV patients with stage
0 fibrosis, and the 137 healthy volunteers.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics and liver biopsy findings
The mean age was 41 ± 9 years (range, 16–72 years); 175 (67%) were male,
and the mean BMI was 26.9 ± 5.2 kg/m2 (range, 17.2–47.3 kg/m2). HCV
genotype was available in 250 patients. Of the remaining 10 patients, 5
were not typeable by the line probe assay, and 5 were not tested. These 10
cases were missing at random and were excluded from subsequent analyses
involving genotype. Because liver biopsy specimens were required to show
at least 4 portal tracts for reliable scoring, complete histological
analysis of necroinflammatory grade and fibrosis staging was available in
only 258 cases; however, steatosis grade could be assessed in all 260
cases. Fibrosis was absent in 39 (15%) patients, was stage 1 in 82 (32%)
patients, was stage 2 in 85 (33%) patients, and was stage 3 in 30 (12%)
patients, whereas cirrhosis (stage 4 fibrosis) was present in 22 (9%)
patients.
Reliable data on the date of infection were available for 117 (45%)
patients. The mean age of infection was 22 ± 7 years; the mean estimated
duration of infection was 19 ± 8 years, and the mean rate of fibrosis
progression was 0.13 ± 0.21 stages per year.
Insulin resistance of hepatis C virus cases compared with matched healthy
volunteers
To assess the influence of HCV infection on IR independent of any effect
of hepatic fibrosis, 121 HCV subjects with minimal (stage 1) or no (stage
0) fibrosis were compared with 137 healthy volunteers matched by sex, BMI,
and WHR. Ideally, a comparison population would also be age matched,
because the frequency of IR increases with age. However, even though the
HCV subjects were younger than the healthy volunteers, they had
significantly higher levels of all markers of IR, including fasting
glucose, insulin, C peptide, and HOMA-IR.
Viral factors associated with the degree of insulin resistance
To determine the possible virus-related factors involved in the
pathogenesis of IR, we assessed whether HOMA-IR was associated with the
viral genotype or the severity of portal or periportal and lobular
inflammation after controlling for other demographic and biochemical
variables. By univariate analysis, the factors associated with HOMA-IR
were portal or periportal inflammatory grade, viral genotype, age, BMI,
WHR, GGT, albumin, bilirubin, C peptide, and previous treatment (either
nonresponders or relapse after treatment—see Methods. Lobular inflammatory
grade was not associated with HOMA-IR (P = 0.6).
The final model for the independent predictors of HOMA-IR by multiple
linear regression analysis included portal or periportal inflammatory
grade, genotype 3 status (yes or no), BMI, and previous treatment. These
variables explained 30% of the variability in the degree of HOMA-IR.
At each stage of fibrosis, the genotype 3 patients had higher (unadjusted)
mean HOMA-IR than the non-genotype 3 patients. After adjusting for the
effect of other independent predictors in the model, the various
non-genotype 3 groups had comparable HOMA-IR levels, and the adjusted
estimated difference in HOMA-IR between the genotype 3 and non-genotype 3
subjects was –0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], –0.13 to –1.02; P =
0.01). There was no significant interaction between the effects of
genotype 3 status and fibrosis stage, either unadjusted (P = 0.5) or
adjusted (P = 0.4) for the other independent variables.
Because cirrhosis is known to cause IR, the multivariate analysis was
repeated for the subset of 236 noncirrhotic subjects (fibrosis stages 0 to
3). The independent predictors for HOMA-IR were the same as for all
subjects: genotype 3 status (P = 0.005), portal inflammatory grade (P =
0.007), BMI (P < 0.001), and previous treatment (P < 0.001) remained in
the model.
Factors associated with the severity of hepatic fibrosis and the rate of
fibrosis progression
We next assessed whether the extent of IR was associated with the severity
of hepatic fibrosis. By univariate analysis, factors associated with the
stage of fibrosis were age, male sex, past alcohol intake, WHR, ALT, AST,
GGT, albumin, bilirubin, platelet count (negative association),
international normalized ratio, glucose, insulin, C peptide, HOMA-IR,
ferritin, and cholesterol (negative association), portal or periportal
inflammatory grade, lobular inflammatory grade, steatosis, and viral
genotype. By multiple ordinal regression analysis, independent predictors
for the degree of fibrosis were portal or periportal inflammatory grade,
past alcohol intake, HOMA-IR, age, and ALT; platelet count and cholesterol
were significant negative predictors. Together, these factors accounted
for 52% of the variability in hepatic fibrosis stage. Multiple linear
regression analysis with stepwise variable selection confirmed the fitted
model.
The probability of moderate to severe fibrosis (stage 2 to 4) was 45% for
those with a HOMA-IR of 1 compared with 68% for those with a HOMA-IR of 5
(evaluated at the mean value of other independent predictors: portal
inflammatory grade, 2.0; past alcohol intake, 10–40 g/day; age, 41.1
years; ALT, 115 U/L; platelet count, 234; and cholesterol, 4.4 mmol/L).
Although steatosis was associated with fibrosis by univariate analysis, it
was not an independent predictor of fibrotic stage after adjusting for
other factors.
Because genotype 3 subjects had significantly lower HOMA-IR, subgroup
analyses were performed to determine whether HOMA-IR was an independent
predictor for fibrosis in both genotype 3 and non-genotype 3 subjects. By
multiple ordinal regression analysis, HOMA-IR remained independently
associated with the fibrosis stage for both the genotype 3 (OR, 1.4; 95%
CI, 1.0–2.0; P = 0.03) and non-genotype 3 subgroups (OR, 1.2; 95% CI,
1.1–1.4; P = 0.007).
Because cirrhosis is known to cause IR, the multivariate analysis for
predictors of fibrosis stage was repeated on the 236 noncirrhotic subjects
(fibrosis stages 0 to 3). The independent predictors for fibrosis were
unchanged, and HOMA-IR remained in the model (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.5; P
< 0.001). Furthermore, there was no significant association between the C
peptide-insulin ratio and the fibrosis stage for the noncirrhotic patients
(r = –0.1; P = 0.1).
To determine whether HOMA-IR was a cause or a consequence of hepatic
fibrosis, we analyzed the subgroup of 117 patients with a known duration
of infection. By multiple linear regression analysis, HOMA-IR was
independently associated with an increased rate of fibrosis progression.
Factors associated with the extent of hepatic steatosis
To examine the hypothesis that IR was associated with fibrosis through an
effect on hepatic steatosis, we performed a multiple ordinal regression
analysis to determine independent predictors for steatosis grade.
Independent predictors for hepatic steatosis grade were genotype 3 status
(P < 0.001), BMI (P = 0.002), portal inflammation (P = 0.03), and
cholesterol (negative association; P = 0.004). Genotype 3 status remained
a significant factor in the model (P < 0.001) even when cholesterol was
not entered into the model. Although HOMA-IR was not an independent
predictor for steatosis grade, it should be noted that BMI was associated
with HOMA-IR (r = 0.5; P < 0.001).
Insulin resistance of primary biliary cirrhosis cases compared with
hepatitis C virus cases and healthy volunteers
We next considered the possibility that hepatic fibrosis from any
etiology, even in the absence of cirrhosis, may cause IR. We therefore
examined markers of IR in 23 noncirrhotic PBC subjects in whom fibrosis
was staged according to Scheuer (11 with stage 1 fibrosis, 10 with stage 2
fibrosis, and 2 with stage 3 fibrosis) and compared the results with those
of the 39 HCV subjects with no hepatic fibrosis (stage 0) and the 137
healthy volunteers. After controlling for the effects of BMI and sex, HCV
subjects with stage 0 fibrosis were found to have higher levels of serum
insulin (P = 0.01), C peptide (P < 0.01), and HOMA-IR (P = 0.01) than
patients with PBC or healthy controls. However, markers of IR were not
significantly different between the PBC subjects and healthy volunteers.
DISCUSSION by authors
This study, in subjects without a history of diabetes mellitus, shows that
HCV infection increases IR compared with healthy volunteers. There are
genotype-specific effects on IR, and the extent of portal inflammation in
chronic HCV is associated with the degree of IR. Furthermore, increased
HOMA-IR values are associated with a higher rate of fibrosis progression
and more advanced stages of hepatic fibrosis. These data support the
concept that viral-induced IR may facilitate fibrogenesis in chronic HCV
infection.
Use of the homeostasis model assessment model
The HOMA model used in this study has been validated and widely used for
determining the degree of IR in epidemiological studies. HOMA-IR accounts
for approximately 65% of the variability in insulin sensitivity assessed
by the glucose clamp technique. It seems to be as good a predictor of
clamp-determined insulin sensitivity as the short insulin tolerance test
or the intravenous glucose tolerance test analyzed with the minimal model.
HOMA-IR strongly predicts the development of type 2 diabetes, independent
of obesity, body fat distribution, and glucose tolerance status.
Evidence that hepatitis C virus infection is specifically associated with
insulin resistance
In this study, HCV-infected subjects in whom there was no or minimal
hepatic fibrosis were closely matched to healthy volunteers by sex and
anthropometric predictors of IR, namely, BMI and WHR. Although the
HCV-infected subjects were younger than the volunteers, fasting serum
insulin, C peptide, and HOMA-IR were greater in those with HCV infection.
Earlier studies, which found increased fasting insulin levels and reduced
insulin sensitivity in HCV-infected subjects, included patients with
moderate to severe hepatic fibrosis. The present data extend these
findings to HCV-infected subjects with minimal or no fibrosis.
In this study, the grade of portal inflammation, a hallmark of chronic HCV
infection that correlates with fibrotic progression, was associated with
HOMA-IR in nondiabetic subjects. This suggests that the virus itself or
the host inflammatory response to HCV infection contributes to the
development of IR and increases the long-term risk for the development of
type 2 diabetes. We also considered the converse possibility, that is, IR
plays a pathogenic role in hepatic necroinflammation, as is the case for
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, we believe this to be
unlikely because there was no association among the grade of lobular
inflammation, the predominate site of inflammation in NASH, and HOMA-IR.
Further, the findings of 2 small studies that insulin sensitivity and
glucose tolerance improve with antiviral therapy are consistent with our
proposal that IR is mediated by viral infection or the inflammatory
response to HCV, rather than the converse.
It was of interest that patients with previously failed antiviral
treatment had significantly higher IR, independent of BMI, than those who
had not received previous antiviral therapy. It has been suggested that
the impaired response to antiviral therapy in African Americans may relate
to their high rate of central obesity and IR. Prospective studies to
assess whether IR is an independent predictor for a reduced response to
antiviral therapy are required. This is important because implementation
of lifestyle changes can improve insulin sensitivity.
The mechanisms for IR in chronic HCV infection remain unclear. In a recent
report, hyperinsulinemic clamp assessment in 5 HCV-infected subjects
showed reduced glucose disposal consistent with peripheral IR. Activation
of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) system occurs in chronic HCV infection
and correlates with disease activity, and higher levels of TNF expression
may be predictive of a failed response to interferon therapy. TNF also
plays an important role in the pathogenesis of IR and may provide the
pathogenic link between chronic HCV infection and the IR we observed.
The effect of hepatitis C virus infection on insulin resistance varies
between genotypes
An important novel finding of this work is that the effect of HCV
infection on IR depends on viral genotype. Thus, for each stage of hepatic
fibrosis, genotype 3 subjects have lower IR compared with other genotypes,
even after adjusting for the effect of BMI and other confounders. This
would confer a lower risk for developing type 2 diabetes compared with
other HCV genotypes. Indeed, the increased prevalence of diabetes in HCV
has been shown to be predominately among genotype 1– and 2-infected
subjects. It is of interest that, despite lower IR levels, subjects with
HCV genotype 3 have more extensive hepatic steatosis. The implication that
steatosis in genotype 3 is mediated predominately by viral factors and not
IR is consistent with earlier reports.
Insulin resistance is associated with more rapid fibrosis progression in
chronic hepatitis C virus infection
IR and diabetes mellitus are independent predictors of the severity of
hepatic fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; diabetes mellitus is
also associated with increased fibrosis in chronic HCV. The most important
finding of this study (which excluded those with type 2 diabetes mellitus)
is that increased HOMA-IR is a predictor of the stage of fibrosis and the
rate of fibrosis progression, independent of other known factors including
age, male sex, past alcohol intake, platelet count, and portal
inflammation. A recent report found that weight loss can improve hepatic
fibrosis in HCV. This is likely to be a result of the improvement in IR
associated with weight loss, which is consistent with the proposal that IR
is a clinically important determinant of the rate of fibrosis progression
in HCV.
An alternative explanation for the observed association between HOMA-IR
and fibrosis stage is that hepatic fibrosis led to impaired insulin
degradation. Several findings help to exclude that possibility. First,
HOMA-IR remained an independent predictor of fibrosis stage even after the
exclusion of subjects with cirrhosis, which is known to cause IR and
impaired insulin clearance. Second, the observations that C peptide was a
univariate predictor of fibrosis stage and that the serum C
peptide-insulin ratio was similar in different fibrosis stages indicate
that insulin hypersecretion, and not impaired degradation, accounts for
the increase in HOMA-IR in HCV infection. Third, markers of IR in PBC,
even in the presence of moderate portal fibrosis, were lower than those in
nonfibrotic HCV and similar to those in healthy volunteers (after
controlling for the effects of BMI). However, we acknowledge the
possibility that the factors responsible for IR may also be responsible
for causing progressive fibrosis and that the association between HOMA-IR
and fibrosis stage does not prove a casual relationship.
In earlier studies, steatosis in chronic HCV infection has been associated
with increased fibrosis stage. IR was not determined in any of these
reports, but is known to be an important pathogenic factor for steatosis
in NASH. Although IR was not an independent predictor of steatosis in our
cohort, this may be due to the confounding effect of BMI, a predictor of
steatosis that is closely associated with IR.
Plausible mechanisms exist to explain the role of IR in hepatic
fibrogenesis. Hyperinsulinemia can directly stimulate hepatic stellate
cells to proliferate and to secrete extracellular matrix. Further, high
glucose levels and hyperinsulinemia cause up-regulation of connective
growth factor, a cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of fibrosing liver
diseases.
In conclusion, this study provides the first direct evidence for a
genotype-specific association between chronic HCV infection and IR. Our
data support the hypothesis that IR may increase the rate of fibrosis
progression. Strategies to improve insulin sensitivity should be explored
because they may complement antiviral therapy in the management of chronic
HCV infection, particularly in mitigating against fibrotic progression in
nonresponders to interferon-based antiviral therapies.
Hepatology. 2003 Jul;38(1):50-6.
Hepatitis C virus infection and incident type 2 diabetes.
Mehta SH, Brancati FL, Strathdee SA, Pankow JS, Netski D, Coresh J,
Szklo M, Thomas DL.
Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, Johns Hopkins University,
Baltimore, MD; and the Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota
School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Although hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is more common among adults
with type 2 diabetes, it is uncertain whether HCV precedes the development
of diabetes. Thus, we performed a prospective (case-cohort) analysis to
examine if persons who acquired type 2 diabetes were more likely to have had
antecedent HCV infection when enrolled in a community-based cohort of men
and women between the ages of 44 and 65 in the United States
(Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [ARIC]). Among 1,084 adults free
of diabetes at baseline, 548 developed diabetes over 9 years of follow-up
evaluation. Incident cases of diabetes were identified by using fasting
glucose and medical history and HCV antibodies were assessed at baseline. A
priori, persons were categorized as low-risk or high-risk for diabetes based
on their age and body mass index, factors that appeared to modify the type 2
diabetes-HCV infection incidence estimates. The overall prevalence of HCV in
this population was 0.8%. Among those at high risk for diabetes, persons
with HCV infection were more than 11 times as likely as those without HCV
infection to develop diabetes (relative hazard, 11.58; 95% confidence
interval, 1.39-96.6). Among those at low risk, no increased incidence of
diabetes was detected among HCV-infected persons (relative hazard, 0.48; 95%
confidence interval, 0.05-4.40). In conclusion, pre-existing HCV infection
may increase the risk for type 2 diabetes in persons with recognized
diabetes risk factors. Additional larger prospective evaluations are needed
to confirm these preliminary findings.
PMID: 12829986 [PubMed - in process]
HCV/HIV
Coinfected Patients at
Increased Risk for Diabetes
Patients with an ICD-9
diagnosis of HIV were identified from the VA
administrative database from 1991 onwards. Data on age, gender, race,
history of and first date of HIV, HCV and DM diagnoses, and history of
alcohol use was extracted from the VA administrative database. The disease
data was based on ICD-9 codes. The ICD-9 codes for HIV and HCV have been
validated in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS).
These researchers performed an analysis on 41,262 male veterans in care
with HIV infection between October 1991 and September 2001. Among these
patients, 17.9% were co-infected with HCV. Of the 41,262 HIV infected
patients, 14.8% had a diagnosis of DM. The prevalence of DM in HCV
infected patients was 19.7% compared with 13.7% (chi square = 167; p <
0.001) in the HCV negative patients. In a logistic regression model, the
unadjusted odds ratio of having a DM diagnosis in HCV infected patients
was 1.53 (95% CI 1.43 - 1.63). After controlling for age, race, history of
drug and alcohol use, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.71 (95% CI 1.59 -
1.84). Age, Black or Hispanic race and a history of an alcohol related
diagnosis were significantly associated with a diagnosis of DM in the
multivariate model. Adjustment was not made for two important predictors
of DM in general population, body mass index and family history, because
of lack of this information in the administrative database.
These researchers report their study shows that veterans in care with HIV
are at a higher risk of DM than the US population in general. Almost 14%
of HIV infected veterans in care were diagnosed to have DM. This compares
with a prevalence of 11.83%
in veterans in care overall, and
6.2% in the general population in the United
States.
http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health/diabetes/pubs/dmstats/dmstats.htm#7
accessed Jan 08, 2003
Co-infection with HCV increased this risk to 19.7%,
a relative increase of 44% in this study. The risk increased with
increasing age and was higher in African American and Hispanic as compared
with White veterans. Traditional risk factors for DM include body mass
index, family history of DM, increasing age, and Black or Hispanic race.
While these researchers could not adjust for the body mass index or family
history, (because this information was not available in the VA
Administrative database) age, Black and Hispanic race, and a diagnosis of
an alcohol related illness were significantly associated with a diagnosis
of DM.
The researchers also reported this background information. A link between
HCV and DM has been established by several investigators. It is not
surprising since HCV is a major cause of liver cirrhosis, which in turn
predisposes patients to DM though insulin resistance. While some of the
HCV related DM is due to the liver damage it induces, it does not
completely explain the association. In patients with comparable liver
damage due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) or other causes of liver disease,
the risk of DM is lower than in patients with HCV related liver disease.
In a large retrospective study, 21% of the HCV infected patients but only
12% of the HBV infected patients were found to have DM. Among patients
with cirrhosis, HCV was associated with a higher prevalence of DM than
HBV.
The authors concluded that these findings are significant for patient care
as well as policy issues. A higher risk of DM in HCV-HIV co-infected
veterans suggests that this group should be targeted for screening and
early intervention to reduce the long-term complications of DM. Abst. 836.
Butt et al.
Autoimmune
Liver Disease
Viral Causation May Associate With Chronic Diseases
2001 OCT 23 - (NewsRx.com) -- by Sonia Nichols, senior medical writer -
Researchers at the Richard Freeman Research Institute in New Orleans have
performed several studies demonstrating the possibility of a link between
viruses like hepatitis C with chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes.
"Cross-sectional studies performed worldwide have shown that
hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is linked with type 2 diabetes, but
these endocrine and liver diseases have an insidious onset, and it has
been difficult to establish that patients acquire HCV infection before the
development of diabetes," remarked Andrew Mason of the New Orleans,
Louisiana research facility.
Mason believes small animal models and more laboratory analysis will be
needed in order to confirm that causation. Meanwhile, in vitro studies and
clinical trials performed by Mason's group have shown a link between viral
infection and another autoimmune disease, called primary biliary cirrhosis
(PBC), that affects the liver and occurs most often in women.
"We have developed an in vitro model to study the viral induction of
PBC based on the phenotype of the diseased biliary epithelial cells,"
Mason described in the Journal of Nutrition.
Their model showed that when normal biliary epithelial cells were
cocultured with the lymph nodes of patients with disease, those cells
acquired PBC phenotypes, but remained unchanged when coculured with the
lymph nodes of patients with liver diseases other than PBC ("Viral
induction of type 2 diabetes and autoimmune liver disease, J Nutr, October
2001;131(10):2805S-2808S).
"We have also cloned a novel human retrovirus from a PBC biliary
epithelium cDNA library and confirmed that the development of the PBC
phenotype in vitro coincides with the presence of this virus," Mason
said.
Finally, PBC patients in clinical trials who were given antiretroviral
therapy showed marked hepatic improvement and disease reversal, according
to Mason.
Although the research may be difficult, Mason's team anticipates
laboratory models and clinical trials will be useful for showing viral
causation in some chronic diseases.
The corresponding author for this study is Andrew Mason, Richard Freeman
Research Institute, Alton Ochsner Medical Institutions, New Orleans, LA
70121, USA. E-mail: amason@ochsner.org.
Key points reported in this study include:
• It is extremely difficult to establish viruses as a cause of chronic
diseases such as diabetes
• In laboratory models and clinical trials, scientists have seen a link
between viruses and primary biliary sclerosis
• The use of animal and laboratory models may some day establish
hepatitis C virus as a cause of type 2 diabetes
This article was prepared by Virus Weekly editors from staff and other
reports. Copyright 2001, Virus Weekly via NewsRx.com.
HCV
Linked to Type 2 Diabetes
DG DISPATCH - ISVHLD: Hepatitis C Infection
Linked to Type 2 Diabetes
By Emma Patten
ATLANTA, GA -- April 14, 2000 -- Type 2 diabetes
(diabetes mellitus) may be associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV)
infection, according to researchers at the 10th International Symposium on
Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease (ISVHDL).
Shruti Mehta, a doctoral student at the School of
Hygiene & Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD., and
colleagues from the Johns Hopkins University, examined data from the third
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), conducted
between 1988-1994 in the US. Of the 9,841 subjects over the age of 20 who
were assessed for diabetes and HCV infection, 1,242 (8.4 percent) had
diabetes (type 1 and type 2) and 230 (2.1 percent) were anti-HCV positive.
After adjusting for factors such as age, race,
and socioeconomic status, the researchers found that HCV-infected subjects
were four times more likely to have type 2 diabetes than those without HCV
infection (adjusted odds ratio 3.77; 95 percent confidence interval,
1.80-7.87).
They found no association, however, between HCV
infection and type 1 diabetes. Similarly, they found no association
between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and diabetes type 1 or 2.
Suggesting a cause for the association, Mehta
told Doctor's Guide that "it might be a combination of factors that
produce this association. Hepatitis C virus has been shown to replicate
outside the liver and in the pancreas so it could be that HCV may be
causing some concomitant beta cell dysfunction."
Mehta could not confirm whether the fact that
diabetics have to inject themselves could cause HCV transmission or if HCV
transmission caused beta cell dysfunction and, consequently, diabetes.
"We're not sure what the mechanisms are or which condition causes
which," she said.
"Providers should consider screening persons
with one condition for the other since the adverse outcomes of each can be
medically prevented," she added.
Hepatitis C Virus:
Associated With New Onset Diabetes Mellitus
Dr. Terrault and Dr. Khalili from the
University of California, San Francisco, also presented very careful data
from a study assessing the association of new onset diabetes after liver
transplantation in patients with hepatitis C.[6] It has been previously
shown by Drs. Mason and Perillo that the incidence of diabetes mellitus is
2 to 16 times higher in patients with hepatitis C compared to those with
hepatitis B infection or other types of liver disease. As a corollary,
these investigators attempted to determine the rate of diabetes mellitus
in patients who were hepatitis C positive after liver transplantation.
Their results also indicate that chronic hepatitis C was predictive of
persistent diabetes mellitus and that the risk was increased approximately
2- to 3-fold compared to the HCV noninfected population. The authors
carefully controlled for immunosuppression -- which may influence glucose
intolerance -- and found through multiple analyses that the strongest
independent predictor of diabetes post liver transplantation was chronic
hepatitis C infection. Again, these findings suggest a possible etiologic
relationship between both chronic hepatitis C and diabetes mellitus.
References Mika BP, Lam NP, McCarthy ME, Layden TJ, et al: Pretreatment
Histology activity index (HAI) is an indicator of early HCV viral
clearance with IFN therapy [Abstract L0290]. Digestive Disease Week,
Orlando, Fla, 1999. Bonkovsky HL, Israel J, Fontana R, et al: Iron
reduction prior to and during interferon therapy of chronic hepatitis C:
Initial results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in
previously untreated patients [Abstract L0051]. Digestive Disease Week,
Orlando, Fla, 1999. Brillanti S, Levantesi F, Foli M, et al: Amantadine
and RebetronTM exert a synergistic antiviral effect on HCV replication in
Interferon-a non-responders with chronic hepatitis C [Abstract L0057].
Digestive Disease Week, Orlando, Fla, 1999. Bellobuono AA, Tempini SS,
Mondazzi LL, et al: Breakthrough incidence may be decreased by alpha
Interferon and Ribavirin combination treatment in chronic hepatitis C
[Abstract L0044]. Digestive Disease Week, Orlando, Fla, 1999. Yoshida H,
Arakawa Y, Yokosuka O, et al: How long will the virological sustained
responder to IFN remain at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma?
[Abstract L0493]. Digestive Disease Week, Orlando, Fla, 1999. Khalili M,
Watson J, Bass N, et al: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is associated with new
onset diabetes mellitus (DM) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT)
[Abstracts L0457]. Digestive Disease Week, Orlando, Fla, 1999.
Hepatitis C Infection
Increases Diabetes Risk
Monday October 16 5:36 PM ET
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People who
are 40 years of age or older and infected with hepatitis C have more than
triple the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, the type of diabetes that
commonly occurs in adulthood. Nearly 3 million Americans have chronic
hepatitis C, a viral infection of the liver. The virus can lead to
cirrhosis and liver cancer and is the leading cause of liver transplant in
the US. In the new study, Shruti Mehta and associates from Johns Hopkins
University in Baltimore, Maryland looked at more than 9,800 adults who
took part in a health survey. Just over 8% of the study participants had
type 2 diabetes and about 2% had evidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV)
infection, according to a report in the October 17th issue of the Annals
of Internal Medicine. The rate of type 2 diabetes was notably higher in
the HCV-positive group than in the HCV-negative group, the researchers
note, except in persons younger than 40 years of age. In the 40 to 49 year
age group, those with HCV infection were 3.1 times as likely to have type
2 diabetes as those without HCV infection. Previous studies have linked
HCV to diabetes, but only in people with severe liver disease. These
results confirm that type 2 diabetes occurs at higher rates even among
patients with milder forms of HCV infection, the authors conclude. Further
research is needed to determine exactly how HCV contributes to the
development of diabetes. However, Mehta and colleagues believe that the
findings are ''consistent with the inference that HCV infection causes
type 2 diabetes through progressive liver damage.''
SOURCE: Annals of Internal Medicine
2000;133:592-599.
Audrey Spolarich
Health Policy Analysts, Inc.
Washington, DC
202-638-0551.
Excess
Prevalence Of Hepatitis C Seen In Diabetics
Diabetes Care 1996;19:998-1000. WESTPORT
Sep 20 (Reuters)
The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection was found to be four times higher among diabetics than controls in a recent study from Spain, leading the researchers to speculate the virus may play a role in the etiology of the disease.
Among 176 Type I and II diabetic patients, the rate of serologic detection of anti-HCV was 11.5%, compared with 2.5% among the 6,172 blood donors evaluated as controls. Dr. Rafael Simo of the Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron in Barcelona, Spain, reports that both groups had the same prevalence of prior blood transfusion, intravenous drug abuse, hospital admissions and surgical procedures.
Among the diabetics who tested positive for hepatitis C, 72.3% had abnormal liver function test (LFT) findings, compared with 24.7% of the controls. "In consequence, based on our results, testing for HCV infection in diabetic patients with an abnormal LFT is mandatory," Dr. Simo concludes.
Dr. Simo adds that although the study is the first demonstration that diabetics have an abnormally high prevalence of the virus, it found no reason for the difference. However, he suggests the lack of any pertinent epidemiological factor "...supports the hypothesis that HCV may have a direct role in the development of diabetes," either by attacking the pancreas directly or contributing to the immune system activation directed against islet cells.
SERUM CHOLESTATIC
ENZYMES AND PREVALENCE OF DIABETES AND GALLSTONES IN CHRONIC VIRAL LIVER
DISEASE.
G. Budillon. L. Cimino, A. D'Arienzo, M.R.
Franco, B. D'Ascoli, N. Caporaso*, A. AscioneX. C. Del Vecchio Blanco*.
Cattedre di Gastroenterologia Universita "Federico II" Napoli,
*II Ateneo Napoli, XUnita Fegato Ospedale A. Cardarelli Napoli - Italy
The prevalence of intrahepatic
cholestasis in viral chronic liver disease is still undefined; it was
estimated to be higher than 30% in a population from Italy and from the
London area (Bartolini et al. Drug Invest. 1992; 4 suppl., 83-9).
Cholestasis can negatively affect the evolution of cirrhosis and the
responsiveness to interferon (IFN) treatment in viral chronic hepatitis.
In this retrospective multicentre survey we evaluated 1557 consecutive
virus hepatitis patients (1993-1994) from South Italy, of whom 770 with
chronic hepatitis (mean age 47 yrs; range 14-81) and 787 with cirrhosis
(mean age 56; range 18-86 yrs). An increase of both the cholestatic
enzymes, (alcaline phosphatase [ALP] and gamma-glutamyl-transferase [GGT]
was detected in 230 patients (14.7%), 50% of whom with hyperbilirubinemia.
The liver disease originated from C-hepatitis virus in 80.4% of patients
and from B hepatitis virus in 17.4% The serum increase of cholestatic
enzymes was similar in degree and frequency in C and B virus cases (11% vs
12.6%; p = n.s.). The cholestatic enzymes were increased in 7.4% of
patients with chronic hepatitis (23% of them with hyperbilirubinemia) and
in 22% of cirrhotics (64% with hyperbilirubinemia) (p < 0.01). The
prevalence of asymptomatic gallstones and diabetes was evaluated in
relation to the increase in cholestatic enzymes. In chronic hepatitis,
diabetes was present in 20.4% of subjects with versus 6.8% of subjects
without serum increase of ALP and GGT (p < 0.005). In the cirrhotic
group the frequency of diabetes was similar in both subgroups of patients
(26.6% vs 33.8%; p = n.s.). Gallstones were detected in 11.9% and in 6.5%
of patients with and without enzyme increase respectively (p = n.s.). In
the cirrhotic group gallstones were significantly more frequent in the
cholestatic group (28.8 versus 19.8% non cholestatic; p < 0.05).
In conclusion diabetes, gallstones and serum
increases of ALP and GGT were significantly more frequent in cirrhosis
than in chronic hepatitis. In chronic hepatitis diabetes was more frequent
in patients with cholestasis, while gallstones were observed more
frequently in cholestatic cirrhosis. The physiopathologic relationships of
diabetes and gallstones with cholestasis and their effects on antiviral
therapy require further evaluation in viral chronic liver disease.
Association of Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Hepatology, February 1999, p. 328-333, Vol. 29, No. 2Andrew L. Mason1, Johnson Y. N. Lau2, Nicole Hoang1, KePing Qian2,
Graeme J. M. Alexander3, Lizhe Xu1, Linsheng Guo1, Sheraj Jacob1,
Fredric G. Regenstein1, Robert Zimmerman4, James E. Everhart5, Clive
Wasserfall6, Noel K. Maclaren6, and Robert P. Perrillo1
From the 1Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alton Ochsner
Medical Institutions, New Orleans, LA; 2Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; 3
Department of Medicine, Cambridge University School of Clinical
Medicine, England; 4Section of Endocrinology, Alton Ochsner Medical
Institutions, New Orleans, LA; 5Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institute of Diabetes, and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases, Bethesda, MD; and 6Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
ABSTRACT
While patients with liver disease are known to have a higher prevalence
of glucose intolerance, preliminary studies suggest that hepatitis C
virus (HCV) infection may be an additional risk factor for the
development of diabetes mellitus. To further study the correlation of
HCV infection and diabetes, we performed a retrospective analysis of 1,117 patients with chronic viral hepatitis and analyzed whether age,
sex, race, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HCV infection, and
cirrhosis were independently associated with diabetes. In addition, a
case-control study was conducted to determine the seroprevalence of HCV
infection in a cohort of 594 diabetics and 377 clinic patients assessed
for thyroid disease. In the former study after the exclusion of patients
with conditions predisposing to hyperglycemia, diabetes was observed in
21% of HCV-infected patients compared with 12% of HBV-infected subjects
(P = .0004). Multivariate analysis revealed that HCV infection (P = .02)
and age (P = .01) were independent predictors of diabetes. In the
diabetes cohort, 4.2% of patients were found to be infected with HCV
compared with 1.6% of control patients (P = .02). HCV genotype 2a was
observed in 29% of HCV-RNA-positive diabetic patients versus 3% of local HCV-infected controls (P < .005). In conclusion, the data suggest a
relatively strong association between HCV infection and diabetes,
because diabetics have an increased frequency of HCV infection,
particularly with genotype 2a. Furthermore, it is possible that HCV
infection may serve as an additional risk factor for the development of
diabetes, beyond that attributable to chronic liver disease alone. (H
EPATOLOGY 1999;29:328-333.)
INTRODUCTION
Individuals with type II diabetes have an increased prevalence of
cirrhosis, and a proportion of patients with acute and chronic liver
disease develop diabetes mellitus.1,2 Also, patients with various forms
of liver disease can be predisposed to impaired glucose tolerance
because of corticosteroid and hydrochlorthiazide therapy or
hemochromatosis.1,3 In addition to these known risk factors, there is
now emerging epidemiological data to suggest that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may also contribute to the development of diabetes. For
example, glucose intolerance is observed more often in patients with HCV
infection compared with controls with liver disease,4-7 and the
frequency of HCV infection in European populations with type II diabetes
has been reported to be higher than expected compared with the general
population.8-10 While these investigations suggest an epidemiological
association between HCV infection and type II diabetes, no large,
controlled studies have been performed to support this conclusion.
To establish a potential relationship between HCV infection and
diabetes, we performed three studies: 1) a retrospective cross-sectional
study to determine the prevalence of diabetes in patients with HCV
infection compared with those with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)
infection; 2) a seroprevalence study of anti-HCV antibody in a cohort of
diabetics and a population of patients undergoing thyroid evaluation to
determine the prevalence of HCV infection in diabetics and a
representative outpatient control group; and 3) an HCV genotype study of
diabetic and nondiabetic patients with HCV infection, because certain
HCV genotypes have previously been shown to be associated with
extrahepatic manifestations of disease.11,12
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Chronic Viral Hepatitis Cross-sectional Study. Available records from
all outpatients referred to the St. Louis Veterans Administration
Medical Center (n = 517), from 1978 to April 1994, or to the Ochsner
Clinic, New Orleans, LA (n =600), from 1988 to June 1995, for evaluation
of chronic viral hepatitis were abstracted. All chronic viral hepatitis
patients with adequate documentation of abnormal serum aminotransferases
for greater than 6 months, viral hepatitis serology, and endocrine
assessment were included in the database. A diagnosis of HBV infection
was made if patients had evidence of hepatitis B surface antigen, with
or without hepatitis B e antigen or HBV DNA. HCV infection was diagnosed
if patients were seropositive for anti-HCV, and confirmational testing
was performed by either radioimmunoblot assay or HCV-RNA determination
if the diagnosis was in doubt. Patients with a diagnosis of non-A, non-B
hepatitis before 1989 who were subsequently found to have HCV infection
were also included in the study.
Patients were assigned a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus if there was
documented use of oral hypoglycemic medication or insulin; random
glucose in excess of 200 mg/dL, or fasting glucose greater than
140 mg/dL on two occasions; or primary management for the treatment of
diabetes.13 Liver biopsy data was available from 574 patients, and a diagnosis of cirrhosis was either established by histology (n = 207), or
a presumptive diagnosis was made when patients developed ascites,
hematologic evidence of hypersplenism, or a marked coagulopathy that
contraindicated a liver biopsy (n= 35). Records were also evaluated for
age, sex, and race. Patients were excluded from the final analysis if
they had conditions that may predispose to hyperglycemia (n = 201), such
as hemochromatosis, chronic pancreatitis, carcinoma of the pancreas,
total parenteral nutrition, and corticosteroid or hydrochlorthiazide
therapy.
Diabetes Case-Control Study. Consecutively collected serum samples were
obtained from the pathology laboratory at Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans,
LA, from 594 patients undergoing glycosylated hemoglobin estimation and
377 patients referred for radionucleotide thyroid scan. All patients
were attending the main campus and peripheral affiliated clinics in the
New Orleans and Baton Rouge regions; the former group was comprised of
diabetics, and the latter patients were nondiabetic. Each sample was
tested for anti-HCV (HCV EIA II Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL)
without knowledge of the patients' serological or endocrine status. The
records of each diabetic patient were subsequently assessed for age,
sex, race, and serum aminotransferases, which were categorized as either
always normal, intermittently abnormal, or always abnormal.
The frequency of HCV genotypes was assessed in all reproducibly positive
samples and compared with the distribution of genotypes of
95 HCV-infected patients attending the hepatology clinic. In addition,
the serum samples from the HCV-infected diabetics were assessed for
autoantibodies to insulin by radioimmunoassay, islet cell antigens by
indirect immunofluorescence, and glutamate decarboxylase by a depletion
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, as previously described.14-16
Records from each HCV antibody-positive diabetic were reviewed for the
date of diagnosis of diabetes, type of diabetes mellitus, and dates of
possible exposure to HCV infection or onset of hepatitis when known. All
patients over the age of 40 presenting with diabetes and those without
an insulin requirement were assigned a diagnosis of type II diabetes.
Subjects who had a history of diabetic ketoacidosis or those presenting
below the age of 30 with a clinical requirement for insulin were
assigned a diagnosis of insulin-dependent or type I diabetes. The risk
factors for HCV infection that were analyzed included intravenous drug
abuse, blood or blood-product transfusion, major surgery, hemodialysis,
household contact, sexual exposure, and tattoos. Patients were then
classified into three categories: onset of diabetes mellitus before
recorded risk factors for exposure to HCV infection; onset of diabetes
occurring after risk of exposure to HCV infection; and an indeterminate
onset of HCV infection having either no discernible risk factors, or
risk factors both before and after the onset of diabetes. These studies
were approved by the Ochsner Medical Foundation Clinical Investigations
Committee.
HCV Genotyping. We used the nomenclature for HCV genotypes proposed by Simmonds et al.17 HCV genotypes were determined by restriction fragment
length polymorphism of the nested polymerase chain reaction product using primers derived from the HCV 5' untranslated region.18,19 Briefly,
the 5' untranslated region was reverse-transcribed and amplified by
nested polymerase chain reaction using outer primers (antisense:
5'-TCATGGTGCACGGTCTACGAGACCT-3', sense: 5'-CTGTGAGGAACTACTGTCTT-3') and inner primers
(antisense: 5'-CACTCGCAAG CACTATCAGGCAGT-3'; sense:
5'-TCACGCAGAAAGCGTCTAG-3') as described previously.18,19 The amplicons were then digested by two sets of restriction enzymes, Hae
III/Rsa I and Mva I/Hinf I, to differentiate HCV into various major genotypes (types
1-6). Subtypes la/c and lb were further differentiated by restriction
with the enzyme, BstU I. Subtypes 2a/c and 2b, as well as subtypes 3a
and 3b, were further differentiated by digestion with ScrFI.
Statistical Analysis. Univariate methods included a t test to compare
means of groups for continuous variables, and for categorical variables,
2 analysis was used unless Fisher's exact test was required for
frequency tables when greater than 20% of the expected values were less
than 5. The Bonferroni adjustment was used to correct the interpretation
of significance for multiple comparisons. Following the removal of
patients with conditions predisposing to hyperglycemia from the chronic
viral hepatitis cohort, the categorical variables of sex, race,
virological diagnosis, and histological diagnosis, as well as the
continuous variable of age, were assessed in a multiple logistic
regression model using the null hypothesis that their coefficients were
statistically not different from zero. The multiple logistic regression
models were constructed to process data by both forward selection and
backward elimination, and were constructed to test the interaction of
independent variables.
RESULTS
Factors Associated With Diabetes in the Chronic Viral Hepatitis
Cross-sectional Study. Diabetes was detected in 24% of HCV-infected
individuals as compared with 13% of those with HBV infection alone (P
< .0001; 95% CI: 1.4-2.4). However, other significant differences were
observed between patients with HBV infection and HCV infection in other
characteristics such as age, sex, race, and the number of diabetics
excluded from the final analysis (Table 1). For example, the HCV cohort
had a higher proportion of patients over the age of 61, women, subjects
of European descent, and fewer patients of African or Asian descent. A
total of 201 patients were excluded for criteria predisposing to
hyperglycemia (Table 1). The majority of the patients excluded were on
corticosteroid immunosuppression following orthotopic liver
transplantation. The proportion of patients with exclusion criteria were
similar in the groups with HBV and HCV infection, but 34% of the
excluded patients in the HCV cohort were diabetic, compared with 18% of
the HBV-infected population (P = .015; 95% CI: 1.1-3.0).
After the removal of patients with conditions causing hyperglycemia
(Table 2), diabetes was observed in 21% of patients with HCV infection
compared with 12% of subjects infected with HBV (P = .0004; 95% CI:
1.3-2.4). Patients with cirrhosis were more likely to have glucose
intolerance compared with those without (23% vs. 14%; P < .02), but sex
and race had little impact on the diagnosis of diabetes (Table 2). For
patients with cirrhosis, the prevalence of diabetes was significantly
greater in those with HCV infection compared with subjects infected with
HBV (Fig. 1A and 1B). In the noncirrhotic cohort, however, the frequency
of diabetes was only significantly greater in those with HCV infection
when the entire cohort was entered into the analysis (Fig. 1A). The
effect of aging on the development of diabetes was assessed by
stratifying the chronic viral hepatitis cohort by quintiles for age. In
this analysis, HCV infection was associated with an increased prevalence
of diabetes in all but the youngest quintile (Fig. 2A and 2B). Antiviral
therapy had little impact on the prevalence of diabetes, because 18% of
those with a diagnosis of diabetes and 17% without had a recorded use of
interferon alfa.
The multivariate analyses revealed that patient age and HCV infection
were the only significant independent predictors for diabetes. The
interaction of cirrhosis and diabetes was assessed in a second logistic
regression for patients with available histological data, and no
relationship was observed between these two variables. In the logistic
regression, the age of the patient (P = .01) and HCV infection (P = .02)
were associated with diabetes, and the relative odds for HCV-infected
patients developing diabetes was calculated to be 2.1 (95% CI:
1.12-3.90) in this data set.
Characterization of HCV-Infected Patients in the Diabetes Case-Control
Study. In the diabetic cohort, 25 of 596 samples were found to be
reproducibly anti-HCV-positive compared with 6 of 377 samples derived
from thyroid disease controls (4.2% vs. 1.6%; P = .02). With regard to
liver function tests, consistently elevated serum aminotransferases were
seen in 32% of the HCV-infected diabetics compared with 5% of those
without infection (P < .0001) (Table 3). Only 2 patients from the cohort
of HCV-infected diabetics (8%) had type I diabetes, and of the
23 patients with HCV infection and type II diabetes, 12 (52%) had risk
factors for the development of HCV before the onset of diabetes, and
11 (48%) had an indeterminate onset of HCV infection. None of the HCV-infected non-insulin-dependent diabetics had singular risk factors
for HCV infection after the onset of diabetes. Autoantibodies were
detected in 7 HCV-infected diabetics. Two patients had anti-glutamate
decarboxylase (8%), 1 had anti-islet cell antigens (4%), and 5 had
anti-insulin (20%) antibodies. Four patients in the latter group had
type II diabetes, 1 had type I diabetes, and all were receiving insulin
therapy.
Analysis of the HCV-infected diabetic samples revealed different
frequencies of HCV genotypes compared with local controls (Table 4). For
example, genotype 2a was detected in 6 of 21 diabetic patients versus
3 of 95 local HCV-infected patients (29% vs. 3%; P < .005; 95% CI:
3.0-27). In contrast, genotype 1a was found in 45% of the local population and was seen in 14% of the diabetic cohort (P < .05; 95% CI:
0.13-0.75).
DISCUSSION
These studies provide epidemiological and virological data to link HCV
infection and diabetes. In the liver disease cohort, diabetes was
observed in 21% of patients with HCV infection, as compared with only
12% of HBV-infected patients. In the diabetes cohort, more than 20% of
patients with consistently elevated serum aminotransferases had evidence
of HCV infection. In the whole diabetic population studied, the
prevalence of HCV infection (4.2%) was approximately 2.5 times greater
than our outpatient control group. In marked contrast, the
seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen in our diabetic patients
(0.3%; data not shown) was comparable with the prevalence observed in
our local blood donors and current estimates for chronic HBV infection
reported for the United States.20 Taken together, these data suggest
that HCV infection is more closely associated with diabetes than HBV
infection, and this association cannot be attributed to chronic liver
disease alone.
Our findings are in concordance with similar epidemiological studies
from Europe and the Middle East. A striking observation from all the
studies with chronic viral hepatitis cohorts of more than 300 patients,
including our own, is the consistent finding that diabetes was observed
in 24% to 26% of patients with HCV infection compared with 9% to 13% of
patients with HBV infection and other liver disease controls.6,7,21 In the smaller studies with a greater proportion of patients with
cirrhosis, the prevalence of diabetes was observed to be even higher in
patients with HCV infection, ranging from 39% to 50%.4,5,7 In agreement,
we also observed that cirrhosis increased the chances of glucose
intolerance, because 33% of HCV-infected patients with cirrhosis had
evidence of diabetes (Fig. 1A).
Age, cirrhosis, and HCV infection were found to be significant variables
associated with diabetes by univariate analysis in our liver disease
cohort (Table 2). Because there were significant differences between the
cohorts with HCV and HBV infection, no firm conclusions could be drawn
from this analysis concerning the relative contribution of each variable
to glucose intolerance. When patients were segregated by quintiles for age, an increased frequency of diabetes was observed in patients with
HCV infection in all but the youngest age range (Fig. 2). The increased
prevalence of diabetes in the HBV-infected individuals in the youngest
quintile may be partially explained by the high frequency of Asians in
this group (HBV = 13% vs. HCV = 1%), who contributed to the increased
proportion of diabetics in this cohort.
The logistic regression analysis confirmed that age and HCV infection
were independent predictors for diabetes mellitus. In support of this
finding, Fraser et al. also documented that both HCV infection and
increasing age were independent risk factors for diabetes, while
cirrhosis had an insignificant role in their logistic regression analysis of a large cohort of patients with chronic viral hepatitis.5
Likewise, our multivariate analysis determined that cirrhosis was not
an independent risk factor for diabetes in our population, even though
cirrhosis is known to cause glucose intolerance.1 The diminished
contribution of cirrhosis to the development of diabetes in our patients
is illustrated by Fig. 1, in which the prevalence of diabetes was
similar in HCV-infected individuals without cirrhosis compared with
cirrhotic patients with HBV infection. Taken together, these findings
suggest that HCV infection is a more important predictor of glucose
intolerance than cirrhosis, and the combination of both factors further
increases the risk of diabetes.
In the chronic hepatitis cross-sectional study, attempts were made to
exclude patients with potentially confounding variables associated with
diabetes. As a result, 34% of the HCV-infected patients excluded from
the final analysis had diabetes compared with only 18% of those with HBV
infection excluded for conditions predisposing to diabetes (Table 1).
However, there were other factors related to either liver disease or
diabetes that were not satisfactorily addressed in this study. For
example, data concerning increased body mass index and evidence of
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were not derived for the study, both of
which are associated with type II diabetes.22 Another variable not
addressed in this study was alcohol consumption on the assumption that the prevalence of alcohol abuse would be evenly distributed irrespective
of viral diagnosis, and also because patients with evidence for
pancreatitis were excluded from the final analysis. Of note, other
investigators have reported that the prevalence of diabetes is lower in
patients with alcohol-related liver disease alone as compared with those
with chronic HCV infection.6 Although the specific effects of antiviral
regimens were not completely addressed, it is unlikely that interferon
alfa treatment had a substantial effect on the development of diabetes,
because the frequency of diabetes was similar in the treated and
nontreated patients.
This is the first case-control study known to the authors that assesses
the anti-HCV seroprevalence in a diabetic population using an outpatient
comparison group. Significant differences in the frequency of HCV
infection were observed in our diabetic patients compared with those
being assessed for thyroid disease (4.2% vs. 1.6%) as well as first-time
blood donors (4.2% vs. 0.8%; data not shown). However, the latter group
often does not provide adequate control data for a study of viral
hepatitis, because blood donors are volunteers screened for exposure to
blood products and behavior that increase the risk of developing viral
hepatitis. In agreement with our findings, other studies have reported
an increased seroprevalence of HCV infection, varying from 8% to 11%, in
European diabetic populations in comparison with their local blood
donors or the expected national frequency.8-10
The unusual distribution of HCV genotypes in our diabetic population
merits further attention, even though the limited number of patients
studied prevents definite conclusions. HCV genotypes 1a and 1b are found
in approximately 70% of HCV-infected individuals in North America23 and
were only demonstrated in 38% of our diabetic cohort (Table 4).
Furthermore, we observed a markedly increased frequency of genotype 2a
in our diabetic cohort (29%) (Table 4). This genotype was only found in
3% of our local population and in 4% of HCV-infected individuals in the
United States.23 This may be a biologically significant finding, because
preliminary reports suggest that HCV genotype 2a is preferentially
associated with extrahepatic syndromes associated with HCV infection
such as mixed cryoglobulinemia and benign monoclonal gammopathy.11,12
Further study of this interesting association between HCV gentoypes and
diabetes is warranted.
In humans, there is now preliminary evidence to link other viruses, such
as Coxsackie virus, with the development of type I diabetes.24 The P2-C
protein of Coxsackie B virus shares regional amino acid homology with
glutamate decarboxylase, an islet cell antigen, providing a possible
mechanism for the induction of autoimmunity by viral molecular mimicry
of host proteins.24 In regard to the latter, autoantibodies to islet cell antigens were rarely observed in our cohort of HCV-infected
diabetics.
In conclusion, we have established an association between diabetes
mellitus and HCV infection. It remains to be determined whether HCV
infection leads to diabetes or vice versa. One could argue that patients
with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of exposure to HCV
infection. However, the similar frequencies of HBV infection in our
diabetic cohort and the local blood donors argues against diabetics
having a significantly increased risk of exposure to hepatitis agents.
Likewise, the significant abnormalities in distribution of HCV genotypes
observed in our diabetic cohort are unlikely to be attributable to
chance alone. Nevertheless, HCV infection cannot be considered to be a
cause of diabetes without establishing a temporal relationship for the
development of each disorder, and prospective studies are clearly needed
to clarify these issues. In addition, demonstration of the specific
endocrine abnormalities associated with HCV infection and improvement in
glucose tolerance during antiviral therapy would strengthen the
association of HCV infection and diabetes. These studies are warranted
because it could lead to a different means of approaching the management
of this common and serious endocrine disease.
Acknowledgment
The endocrine advice from Steven Giddings, M.D., and Janet McGill, M.D.
(Washington University, St. Louis, MO), as well as Alan Burshell, M.D.
(Alton Ochsner Medical Institutions, New Orleans, LA), was greatly
appreciated while planning this study. The authors also thank Abe
Wattar, M.D., Deborah Baudy, B.S., and Elizabeth Jones, B.A. (Alton
Ochsner Medical Institutions, New Orleans, LA), for assistance with
serology and HCV genotyping. In addition, they are indebted to Mary
Kuhns, Ph.D. (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), for providing
serological reagents.
Abbreviations
HCV, hepatitis C virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus
Footnotes
Received March 31, 1998; accepted August 24, 1998.
Supported by research grants NATO (CRG 920697) Collaborative Research Grant (to A.L.M., G.J.M.A., and R.P.P.); a Hans Popper Scholar Award from the American Liver Foundation and a Glaxo Institute of Digestive Health Clinical Investigator Award (to J.Y.N.L.); and (RO1. HD19469-11) National Institutes of Health (to N.K.M.).
Dr. Lau's current address is: Schering Plough Research Institute,
Kenilworth, NJ.
Dr. Regenstein's current address is: Department of Surgery, Tulane
University Medical Center, New Orleans, LA.
Noel K. Maclaren's current address is: Research Institute for Children, Harahan, LA.
Address reprint requests to: Dr. Andrew L. Mason, Section of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alton Ochsner Medical Institutions, 1520 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121. E-mail:
amason@ochsner.org; fax: (504) 842-3792.
REFERENCES
1.Petrides AS. Liver disease and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Rev
1994;2:2-18.2.Muting D, Wohlgemuth D, Dorsett R. Liver cirrhosis and diabetes mellitus. Geriatrics 1969;24:91-993.Niedereau C, Fischer R, Sonnenberg A, Stremmel W, Trampisch H, Strohmeyer G. Survival and causes of death in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with primary hemochromatosis. N Engl J Med1985;313:1256-12624.
Allison MED, Wreghitt
T, Palmer CR, Alexander GJM. Evidence for a link between hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes mellitus in a cirrhotic population. J
Hepatol 1994;21:1135-11395.Fraser GM, Harman I, Meller N, Niv Y, Porath A. Diabetes mellitus is associated with chronic hepatitis C but not chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Isr J Med Sci
1996;32:526-5306. Grimbert S, Valensi P, Levy-Marchal C, Perret G, Richardet JP, Raffoux
C, Trinchet JC, et al. High prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients
with chronic hepatitis C. A case control study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1996;20:544-5487.Ozyilkan E, Arslan M. Increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1480-14818.Ozylikan E, Erbas T, Simsek H, Telatar
F, Kayhan B, Telatar H. Increased prevalence of hepatitis C virus
antibodies in patients with diabetes mellitus [Letter]. J Intern Med
1994;235:283-2859.Gray A, Wreghitt T, Stratton IM, Alexander GJM, Turner RC, O'Rahilly S. High prevalence of hepatitis C infection in
Afro-Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes and abnormal liver function
tests. Diabet Med 1995;12:244-24910.Simo R, Hernandez C, Genesca J, Jardi R, Mesa J. High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care1996;
19:998-100011. Andreone P, Gramenzi A, Cursaro C, Benardi M, Zignego AL. Monoclonal gammopathy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Blood 1996;88:112212.Zignego AL, Ferri C, Giannini C, Monti M, LaCivita L, Careccia C, Longombardo G, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotype analysis in patients with type II mixed
cryoglobulinemia. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:31-3413.Fajans S.
Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. In: Rifkin H, Porte D (eds).
Diabetes Mellitus: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. New York: Elsevier,
1990:346-356.14.Mehta HB, Minkin S, Ullman B, Ullman EF. DELISA: a sensitive nonisotopic assay for GAD antibodies [Abstract]. Diabetes 1995;44(Suppl 1):77A.15.Riley WJ, Maclaren NK, Krischer JP, Spiller RP, Silverstein JH, Schatz DA, Shah S, et al. A prospective study of the development of diabetes in relatives of patients with insulin dependent diabetes. N Engl J Med
1991;323:1167-117216.Vardi P, Dib SA, Tuttleman M, Connely JE, Grinbergs M, Riley WJ, Maclaren NK, et al. Competitive insulin antibody RIA. Prospective evaluation of subjects at high risk
for development of type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1987;36: 1286-129117.Simmonds P, Alberti A, Bonino F, Bradley DW, Brechot C, Brouwer JT, Chan SW, et al. A proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genotypes [Letter]. HEPATOLOGY 1994;19:1321-132418.Lau JYN, Mizokami M, Kolberg JA, Davis GL, Prescott LE, Ohno T, Perrillo RP, et al. Application of six hepatitis C virus genotyping systems to sera from chronic hepatitis C patients in the United States. J Infect Dis 1994;171:281-28919.McOmish F, Yap PL, Dow BC, Follett EAC, Seed C, Keller AJ, Cobanin TJ, et al. Geographical distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in blood donors: an international collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:884-89220.Alter MJ, Mast EE. The epidemiology of viral hepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterol Clin North
Am 1994;23:437-45521.Caronia S, Taylor K, Pagliaro L, Carr C, Palazzo U, O'Rahilly S, Alexander G. Strong association between HCV and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus [Abstract]. J Hepatol 1996;25(Suppl 1):95.
22.Wanless IR, Lentz JS. Fatty liver hepatitis (steatohepatitis) and obesity: an autopsy study with analysis of risk factors. HEPATOLOGY
1990;12:1106-111023.Lau YN, Davis GL, Prescott LE, Maertens G, Lindsay K, Qian K, Mizokami M, et al. Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes determined by line probe assay in patients with chronic hepatitis C seen at tertiary referral centers in the United States. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:868-87624.Clements GB, Galbraith DN, Taylor KW. Coxsackie B virus infection and onset of childhood diabetes. Lancet 1995;346:221-223
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
http://hepatitis-central.com/hcv/diabetes/hcv/infection.html
Diabetes and hepatitis C
Prof. Dr. med. J. Reichen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
•Hepatitis C - in particular genotype 2A - clearly predisposes to
diabetes mellitus (12); in this study involving over 1'000 patients with
chronic viral hepatitis, 21 % of HCV infected patients had diabetes as
compared to 12 % of patients with chronic hepatitis B (p<0.0004).
Furthermore, in diabetics 4.2 % were infected with HCV as compared to 1.6 of local controls. Finally, genotype 2A was found in 29 % of
patients with diabetes as compared to 3 % in the local HCV cohort (12). •In a cross sectional national survey, 9841 adults were tested for the
presence of diabetes and anti-HCV (15). The prevalence of diabetes and
hepatitis C was 8.4 and 2.1 %, respectively. Persons aged > 40 with hepatitis C had a 3.77x increased risk to suffer from diabetes (15). •Diabetes mellitus is increased in patients with cirrhosis. However,
postviral cirrhosis due to hepatitis C is even more frequent. Thus, in
liver transplant patients, HCV-positive transplant candidates had
diabetes in 50 % of cases as compared to 9 % of patients with other etiologies (1). In another study investigating patients after
OLT, 23 %
developped diabetes after transplantation; this figure was 62 % in
patients transplanted for hepatitis C as opposed to 9 % for patients
transplanted for other causes (10). •Interferon has been described to
induce type I (3, 4, 14) as well as type II (2) diabetes. This is a rare
event: in a retrospective study encompassing over 11'000 patients treated in Italian centers, only 10 patients developped de novo diabetes
mellitus (5). In a Japanese study investigating high dose interferon,
this was observed in 5/987 patients (13). •Type I has been described in
a patient with HLA DRB*04/08. DQA1 52 ARG/ARG and DQB1 57 N-ASP ASP
allele developping autoantibodies against islets and glutamic acid
dexarboxylase suggesting that interferon may induced type I diabetes in
genetically predisposed patients (4). This is a rare event since in
prospective studies no islet cell autoantibodies were observed during
interferon treatment (3, 8, 9). •Insulin autoantibodies in a prospective
study were observed in 3.3 and 13.3 % of patients before and after
interferon treatment, respectively (3); none had islet autoantibodies.
Reference List
1.Allison MED, Wreghitt T, Palmer CR, Alexander GJM. Evidence for a link between hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes mellitus in a
cirrhotic population. J Hepatol 1994; 21(6):1135-1139. 2.Chedin P, Cahen-Varsaux J, Boyer N. Non-insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus developing during interferon-? therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125(6):521-521. 3.Di Cesare E, Previti M, Russo F, Brancatelli S, Ingemi MC, Scoglio R et al. Interferon-? therapy may induce insulin autoantibody development in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41:1672-1677. 4.Fabris P, Betterle C, Greggio NA, Zanchetta R, Bosi E, Biasin MR et al. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during alpha-interferon therapy for chronic viral hepatitis. J Hepatol 1998; 28(3):514-517. 5.Fattovich G, Giustina G, Favarato S, Ruol A, Macarri G, Orlandi F et al. A survey of adverse events in 11241 patients with chronic viral hepatitis treated with alfa interferon. J Hepatol 1996; 24:38-47. 6.Hadziyannis S, Karamanos B. Diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 1999; 29(2):604-605. 7.Hadziyannis SJ. The spectrum of extrahepatic manifestations in hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat 1997; 4(1):9-28. 8.Harman-Boehm I, Zingman L, Hilzenrat N. No evidence for anti-islet autoimmunity in diabetes mellitus associated with chronic hepatitis C infection. Hepatology 1999; 30(1):342-342. 9.Imagawa A, Itoh N, Hanafusa T, Oda Y, Waguri M, Miyagawa J-I et al. Autoimmune
endocrin disease induced by recombinant interferon- ? therapy for chronic active
type C hepatitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995; 80:922-926. 10.Knobler H, Stagnaro-Green A, Wallenstein S, Schwartz M, Roman SH. Higher incidence of diabetes in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998; 26(1):30-33. 11.Lopes EPA, Oliveira PM, Silva AE, Ferraz ML, Costa CHRM, Miranda W et al. Exacerbation of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus During Interferon Alfa Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B. Lancet 1994; 343:244-244. 12. Mason AL, Lau JY, Hoang N, Qian KP, Alexander GJ, Xu LZ et al. Association of diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 1999; 29(2):328-333. 13.Okanoue T, Sakamoto S, Itoh Y, Minami M, Yasui K, Sakamoto M et al. Side effects of high-dose interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 1996; 25(3):283-291. 14.Shiba T, Morino Y, Tagawa K, Fujino H, Unuma T. Onset of diabetes with high titer anti-GAD antibody after IFN therapy for chronic hepatitis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 30:237-241. 15.Mehta SH, Brancati FL, Sulkowski MS et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among persons with hepatitis C virus infection in the United States. Ann Int Med 2000; 133: 592-599
http://www.ikp.unibe.ch/lab2/HCVDM.htm
Hepatitis C
May Be a Cause of Diabetes
The corresponding author for this study is Rafael
Simo, Department of Endocrinology, Hospital General Universitari Vall
d'Hebron, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. October 25,
1996 Disease Associations (HCV) Hepatitis
Weekly via Individual Inc. :
Hepatitis C virus may have a direct role in the development of diabetes,
according to a report from Spain. Researcher Rafael Simo and colleagues
found a high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients
with diabetes, and found that most HCV patients presented with abnormal
liver function tests. "Testing for HCV infection of diabetic patients
with an abnormal liver function test is mandatory," Simo et al. wrote
("High Prevalence of HCV Infection in Diabetic Patients,"
Diabetes Care, September 1996;19(9):998- 1001). "The lack of any
particular epidemiological factor for HCV infection in our diabetic
population suggests that HCV may have a direct role in the development of
diabetes." Mild asymptomatic elevations of serum aminotransferases in
a diabetic patient do not receive much attention because they are often
attributed to fatty infiltration. It has been hypothesized that, during
the course of the disease, diabetic patients are more prone to acquire an
HCV infection because they are subjected to more frequent medical
interventions. While a link between diabetes and HCV has recently been
suggested, a controlled study of prevalence and risk factors for HCV
infection has not yet been performed. "The aim of this study was to
evaluate the prevalence of HCV infection in diabetic patients attending
our outpatient clinic in comparison with blood donors who were matched for
the main risk factors associated with anti-HCV seropositivity," Simo
et al. wrote. "Furthermore, we investigated the influence of several
epidemiological and clinical factors on HCV infection in diabetic
patients, including type of diabetes, duration of the disease, mode of
therapy, and presence of late complications." A total of 176
consecutive diabetic patients were compared with 6172 blood donors,
matched by recognized risk factors to acquire HCV infection. Serologic
testing for anti-HCV was done using a second-generation commercial
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and an immunoblot assay was
performed in anti-HCV positive samples to confirm HCV specificity.
Diabetic patients were divided into two groups according to their HCV
antibody status and analyzed for age, sex, type of diabetes, duration of
disease, mode of therapy, late diabetic complications, previous blood
transfusion, intravenous drug addiction, hospital admissions, major
surgical procedures, and liver function tests. Anti-HCV was detected in 18
diabetic patients and 156 blood donors (11.5 versus 2.5 percent; P <
0.001). The estimated risk for HCV infection in diabetic patients was 4.39
times higher (95 percent CI 2.61-7.24) than in the control group. In
addition, Simo et al. did not observe a significant difference for
previous blood transfusion (21.8 versus 16.7 percent) and intravenous drug
addiction (10.2 versus 5.5 percent) between blood donors and diabetic
patients with HCV infection, respectively. Only age (63.8 +/- 10.2 versus
49.4 +/- 17.8 years) and previous blood transfusion (16.7 versus 1.2
percent; P < 0.05) were statistically related to HCV infection. After
excluding the three anti-HCV positive diabetic patients with previous
blood transfusion, the global prevalence of anti-HCV seropositivity in the
diabetic population (15 of 175, or 8 percent) remained significant in
comparison with the control group (P < 0.001; odds ratio 3.59; 95
percent CI 2.04-6.23). Furthermore, the three anti-HCV positive diabetic
patients with previous blood transfusion were transfused for unrelated
diseases seven, 15, and 23 years before diagnosis of diabetes. In anti-HCV
positive diabetic patients, abnormal liver function tests were seen in
72.3 percent, compared with only 24.7 percent of anti-HCV negative
diabetic patients (P < 0.001). "Diabetic patients have a high
prevalence of abnormal liver function tests that are often attributed to
fatty infiltration without further investigation," Simo et al. wrote.
"In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that diabetic
patients present a higher prevalence of HCV infection than control
subjects who are matched for the main risk factors, such as age, previous
blood transfusion, and intravenous drug addition. In addition, most of
anti-HCV positive patients presented with an abnormal liver function test,
being a combination pattern of cytolysis and cholestasis as the
predominant biochemical alteration. We feel that this is an important
point, since none of these patients had been previously diagnosed with
liver disease, and diabetes was the only reason for referral to our unit.
In consequence, based on our results, testing for HCV infection in
diabetic patients with an abnormal liver function test is mandatory."
The authors suggest their results could be interpreted to mean either that
diabetic patients have some undiscovered epidemiological factor that
increases the risk of acquiring HCV infection or that HCV infection may
have some etiopathogenic role in the development of diabetes. In recent
studies Allison et al. reported a significantly increased rate of diabetes
in patients with HCV related cirrhosis, compared with other causes, and
suggested that HCV infection has some etiopathogenic role in the
development of diabetes (J Hepatol 1994;21:1135-1139). "Several
possible mechanisms can be postulated to link HCV to diabetes," Simo
et al. wrote. "It may be possible that HCV, similar to the hepatitis
B virus, could infect pancreatic islet cells and thereby induce damage to
(alpha)-cells. On the other hand, HCV has been related to diseases in
which the autoimmune phenomena play an important role, such as
cyroglobulinemia, glomerulonephritis, thyroiditis, and Sjogren disease.
Therefore, an autoimmune destruction of endocrine pancreatic tissue
related to HCV antigens or immunocomplexes cannot be excluded."
High Prevalence of
Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care; Volume 19, Number 9, September
1996, Page 998
Rafael Sim, MD, PHD; Cristina Hernandez, MD; Joan Genesc, MD, PHD; Rossend
Jard, MD, PHD; Jordi Mesa, MD, PHDOBJECTIVE
To evaluate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in
diabetic patients and to investigate the influence of several
epidemiological and clinical factors on HCV infection.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
A total of 176 consecutive diabetic patients were compared with 6,172
blood donors, matched by recognized risk factors to acquire HCV infection.
Serologic testing for anti-HCV was done using a second-generation
commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and an immunoblot
assay was performed in anti-HCV positive samples to confirm HCV
specificity. Diabetic patients were divided in two groups according to
their HCV antibody status and analyzed for the following variables: age,
sex, type of diabetes, duration of disease, mode of therapy, late diabetic
complications, previous blood transfusions, intravenous drug addiction,
hospital admissions, major surgical procedures, and liver function tests (LFTs).
RESULTS
A higher prevalence of HCV infection was observed in diabetic patients in
comparison with blood donors (11.5 vs. 2.5%; P < 0.001; odds ratio
4.39; 95% CI 2.61-7.24). We did not detect any particular epidemiological
factor for HCV infection in anti-HCV positive diabetic patients. In these
patients, abnormal LFTs were observed in 72.3%, compared with only 24.7%
of anti-HCV negative diabetic patients (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
A high prevalence of HCV infection was detected in diabetic patients, and
most of anti-HCV positive patients presented with abnormal LFTs.
Therefore, testing for HCV infection of diabetic patients with an abnormal
LFT is mandatory. The lack of any particular epidemiological factor for
HCV infection in our diabetic population suggests that HCV may have a
direct role in the development of diabetes.
|